Man claiming ‘sperm theft’ must support child

Tiberias Family Court rules that minors “cannot be restricted by the behavior or understanding of their parents.”

By
February 12, 2012 22:42
1 minute read.
[illustrative photo]

Court gavel justice judge legal law 311. (photo credit: Thinkstock/Imagebank)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The Tiberias Family Court ruled on Sunday that a man who claims the mother of his five-year-old child “stole his sperm” to become pregnant must pay child support.

The child was conceived when her father, “A.” and her mother, “R.” had a onenight stand while living in a shared apartment, but the parents gave conflicting versions about the circumstances.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


A. claimed the child was conceived as a result of “sperm theft,” that R. had no intention of maintaining contact with him and that she had informed him she would bring up the child independently and not sue him for child support.

R. denies these claims.

In dismissing A.’s arguments, Judge Assaf Zagury said that minors “cannot be restricted by the behavior or understanding of their parents,” and therefore A. must pay child support.

Both the mother and the child are named on the family court suit against A., but the judge noted that the child is entitled to file a suit independently of R.

“Therefore, even if her biological father’s claims are true, they are not sufficient to prevent the minor from succeeding in her current suit,” Zagury said.



The judge added that there have been cases where fathers have been ordered to pay child support even though they argued that they were “fathers against their will” because of sperm theft, or that the mother had refused to terminate a pregnancy, despite previous agreements to do so.

Zagury also noted that A. had maintained contact with his daughter after her birth.

Related Content

Riot
August 31, 2014
Rioting resumes throughout east Jerusalem Saturday night

By DANIEL K. EISENBUD