Beduin boy on rubble of demolished house 370.
(photo credit: Wikimedia Commons)
The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld its decision that the state has the right to
continue planting trees in portions of the area around the Arakib village near
The decision rejected the request of the Beduin villagers’ –
appealing a 2012 decision against them regarding the ownership of the land – to
issue an injunction barring the state from planting in the area.
court justified the project by saying that it was for the benefit of the general
public and for the improvement of the land.
According to the court, the
land in question has been abandoned since 1954, at which time it became state
Since July 2010, there is a ongoing struggle between the local
Beduin and the state, with the villagers’ living areas being repeatedly
destroyed by the state and then rebuilt by the Beduin.
The state later
filed an NIS 1.8 million lawsuit against two Beduin families over the
In March 2012, the Beersheba District Court rejected six lawsuits
brought by Beduin of the Uqbi family regarding private ownership of some 1,000
dunam of land in the Negev and formally endorsed the state’s already de facto
ownership over the land.
The family claimed a presence in the area dating
back to at least the mid-19th century.
It argued that in 1951 they were
evacuated from the land when the IDF confiscated it, and that since then the
state has not granted them permission to return, and has said the land belongs
to the state and was never privately owned.
At the heart of the case was
the debate of whether the Beduin were able to prove that they had private land
rights to the disputed plots, despite a lack of formal landtitle deeds showing
the land had been registered in their name in the Ottoman land registry, the
Tabu. At the time, the court held that the plaintiffs’ documents indicated that
they knew they had a duty to register land in the Tabu but had not wanted to do
“The state said that although the complainants are not entitled to
compensation, it has been willing to negotiate with them,” the judge added. “It
is a shame that these negotiations did not reach any agreement.”
district court also ordered the complainants to pay legal costs of NIS 50,000
for trial costs.
The Uqbi family appealed the ruling to the Supreme
Court, arguing that the Keren Kayemeth LeIsrael- Jewish National Fund’s planting
is irrevocably changing the landscape and damaging the land.
The court on
Tuesday rejected these arguments, and accepted the state’s contentions that
there were no irrevocable changes and no damage to the land and that the area
was in fact being improved.
The state supported its claims by noting the
complainants’ failure to provide expert reports supporting their claims about
damage, instead basing their claims entirely on what it called faulty anecdotal
The state also said that the lawsuit was filed too late, after
the state was already investing in planting in a wide area around Beersheba, of
which the work around Arakib was only one part.
Next, the state noted
that one of the complainants had a restraining order against him for having
previously disturbed planting activities, implying his claims were not
The Supreme Court fined the complainants NIS 6,000 for
pursuing a frivolous appeal.
Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>