Are closer Israel-China ties an attempt to subvert BDS?

Expert on Israel-China relations explains the significance of the free trade talks between the two countries.

March 31, 2016 10:56
3 minute read.

Podcast: Are closer Israel-China ties an attempt to subvert BDS?

Podcast: Are closer Israel-China ties an attempt to subvert BDS?


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief



This week Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced the opening of free trade talks with China, a huge deal for Israel economically and politically.

China, of course, is the world’s most populous country, the second largest economy, and a growing giant. But a lot of people don’t quite understand its role in global trade and politics, and certainly not its relationship with Israel.

Sam Chester, an expert on Israel-China relations who is currently working in the commercial drone industry in the Chinese city of Shenzhen, explains the significance of the talks, whether they're an attempt to subvert BDS, and why Israelis shouldn't be concerned about their jobs.

In Israel, news of opening free trade talks with China has provoked few finger-wags from opposition politicians.

“Israeli industry in general is a free trader, and I think that the notion among industrialists is that as long as it’s free trade that’s on a mutual basis and we have the opportunity to export our products to China, then it’s a fair deal,” said Ohad Cohen, head of Foreign Trade Administration (FTA) at the Economy Ministry.

It’s true, there are some industries that could be vulnerable to competition from China once an agreement is signed, such as the ever-shrinking textile industry, certain natural resource mining industries, communications hardware, and most traditional manufacturing industries.

But for several reasons Israelis remain unphased at the prospects of losing jobs to China.

One is that Israel’s main industrial markets are abroad, so lowering tariffs on Chinese imports won’t affect the buyers of Israeli goods.

“It’s always important to look at the size of the two markets and to realize that for Israelis, they’re really standing to gain from any trade benefits, because they’re having an opportunity to be exposed with reduce tariffs and reduced regulation to a major market in China,” said Sam Chester, an expert on Israel-China relations working in the commercial drone industry in the city of Shenzhen.

For China, Israel’s 8-million strong population is an insignificant market, and will likely serve as a source of technology more than an export destination.

“The cost to Israeli workers, the cost to Israeli industrialists who may see cheaper Chinese manufacturing goods come into the country, isn’t really very high, so it’s a different context” than the US, Chester added.

With the unemployment rate near a historic low at 5.3 percent, another reason the jobs question resonates less in Israel is that joblessness is simply not the most salient economic problem. High prices are.

“A free trade agreement with China will give the economy a huge boost and will achieve a very important goal of lowering prices to the general public,” said Uriel Lynn, the president of the Federation of Israeli Chambers of Commerce, a business association that helped lay the groundwork for FTA talks on Israeli missions to China.

At any rate, he says, previous free trade deals have not cost Israel jobs.

“True, it will require several factories to increase their efficiency and competitiveness, but we have to understand that increasing exports to China will only create more jobs,” he said. “When you export more, you produce more.”

The Economy Ministry’s Cohen also noted that much can change in Israeli industry by the time an agreement is signed.

“In our experience it takes a few years. It can take two years, it could take longer,” he said. But in working out details on everything form rules of origin and duties to intellectual property rights and dispute settlement mechanisms, Israel will also seek to add a modicum of protectionism, he said.

Israel would seek a longer timeline to phase in competition for Israeli industries that seem vulnerable, he said, to ensure they have a chance to retool or adapt.

Cohen also bristled at the idea pushed by some politicians that opening markets in the East is a tool against the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement, which he noted has not had any significant economic effect on the country.

“Unlike some elements in the government that may refer to that, I think that Israel economically needs to diversify its exports without any connection to BDS. Like any business, you don’t want to rely on one or two customers,” he said.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Jerusalem Post News
March 28, 2019
This week in 60 seconds