Another hard left turn for BGU

BGU is actively supporting an organization that defames the State of Israel and bolsters the boycott movement.

May 25, 2016 22:13
3 minute read.
Ben Gurion University

Ben Gurion University. (photo credit: WWW.PIKIWIKI.ORG.IL)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


Ben-Gurion University is yet again embroiled in controversy over its association with the far Left. Last week, Israeli news outlets reported that BGU will be sponsoring a conference at the end of May featuring the highly controversial NGO Breaking the Silence.

The conference, which according to the university will address the historical and current aspects of whistle blowing, is being organized by BGU’s Department of Jewish History and will be featuring Breaking the Silence (BtS) CEO Yuli Novak, as well as the organization’s public relations coordinator, Nadav Weiman, who is scheduled to present his “personal testimony.”

Following a letter sent by Im Tirtzu to BGU president Rivka Carmi, which charged that the university’s sponsorship of the conference is in violation of the Council for Higher Education in Israel’s stand on politicization in academia, the university replied that the conference is “academic” in nature and “promotes and enables an open and diverse dialogue and does not seek to espouse a particular political viewpoint.”

However, a quick look at the conference schedule reveals that the vast majority of speakers are affiliated with the radical and anti-Zionist Left. In addition to participants from BtS, the conference is replete with lecturers who support, inter alia, refusing IDF service, encouraging international pressure on Israel and refusing to work over the Green Line.

The conference is also set to feature the chairman of Physicians for Human Rights – Israel, an Israeli NGO that uses foreign funding to accuse Israel and the IDF of violating international law, and a journalist who wrote for Yediot Aharonot: “There are several settlements, like Tapuach and Yitzhar, which should not only be evacuated, but they should all be sprayed with bullets and killed... As far as I’m concerned killing them is not even considered killing people, but merely eliminating stray weeds.”

Despite BGU’s claim of academic pluralism, the reality remains that this conference has a clear slant to the hard Left.

Incidentally enough, it was in response to this very phenomenon that the Council of Higher Education saw fit to heavily sanction BGU’s Department of Politics and Government several years earlier.

In addition to the politicized line-up of speakers, BGU is also being disingenuous by misrepresenting the name of the conference in its English translation (“Whistleblowing Through the Ages and Today”). The conference in Hebrew is titled, “Shovrei Shtika Ledoroteihem Ve’achshav,” which elicits a clear and unmistakable association to BtS as Shovrim Shtika is the Hebrew name of the organization. The usage of “whistle blowing” in place of the more fitting “breaking the silence” is a clear attempt by the university to deceive its English-speaking benefactors by denying the conference’s obvious connection to BtS.

As in the past, academic freedom is being used to mask a clear political agenda being propagated by BGU. The exchange of ideas and freedom of speech are crucial tenets to a thriving society and higher education, and political groups should have the right to organize events on campus grounds, but this does not give a publicly-funded university the mandate to sponsor such a highly politicized event. Presenting only one side of the debate is not academic freedom; it is forced indoctrination.

The fact that BGU is actively supporting an organization that defames the State of Israel and bolsters the boycott movement is very troubling. This is not only a gross misuse of public funds, but a betrayal of BGU’s student body that strives to achieve a higher education, not to be imbued with the university’s political agenda.

With this clear act of academic politicization, the Council for Higher Education should immediately open up another inquiry to investigate the university’s continuous violation of its guidelines.

The author is the international relations coordinator for the Im Tirtzu movement

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Benjamin Netanyahu and Donald Trump
May 22, 2019
Trump has ‘trumped’ the Islamic Mafia