Borderline Views: 'Dispatches' and Anglo-Jewish self-confidence

Borderline Views Dispa

By
November 23, 2009 20:54

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

On the day that my column appears in the newspaper, I invariably wake up to a full inbox of messages, the vast majority of which take issue with the sentiments expressed, while not a few are personal and invective. Given the time difference and the fact that Jews in Brooklyn, Toronto and London tend to be far more patriotic in the comfort of their Diaspora homes than those who live, experience and contribute to Israel on a daily basis, the bulk of the messages arrive from abroad. While Israeli critics tend to engage with you and prove that you are wrong or misguided, the patriots of the Diaspora resort to tactics of delegitimization, usually branding you an anti-Semite. In some extreme cases, as happened just last week, a letter came from a Jewish philanthropist in London who branded me a traitorous anti-Semitic Jew, cursed me and expressed his hope that I "perish." There was also the time when a brave resident of Brooklyn hoped that my family and I would be the next people to be blown up by a Palestinian suicide bomber. These are two of the more extreme responses I've received after writing hundreds of columns over the years, but they reflect the highly strung emotions and lack of clear thinking expressed by so many readers of opinion columns. LAST WEEK I was expecting a quiet inbox, following a fairly middle-of-the-road column about the need for balance when setting up chairs for Israel studies at universities throughout the world. Instead, my inbox was full of some of the most fiery invective I have ever received, nearly all of it from the UK. The reason? I had appeared briefly (and I admit, mistakenly) on a British television Channel Four program, Dispatches, which had undertaken what it termed an "investigative analysis" of the pro-Israel lobby in the UK and which had aired for the first time on the previous evening. It was clear that the program had presented its topic in such a way as to insinuate that the UK Jewish community acted in covert and illegitimate ways, using its influence and (what else but) its money to put pressure on British politicians, government officials and media outlets. The interviews and images that it showed were highly selective, and any form of balance or counter argument was clearly missing. Judging by the intensity of the response during the following days, with many letters and columns on the program appearing in almost all of Britain's newspapers - including some by people who are not always necessarily known for their defense or support of Israel - it was clear that the program had touched a raw nerve. But for good reason. The fact that the program was later promoted by leading members of the far-Right fascist, racist and anti-Semitic BNP (British National Party) indicates just how one-sided the program was. OF COURSE, the whole premise is laughable. The Jewish community in the UK actually bemoans the fact that, especially in recent years, its voice is being heard less and less - that the media is biased against Israel, that Islamic groups are having greater influence on public policy relating to Israel, and that Israel-bashing, coupled with anti-Semitism, is taking over those places - such as universities and the trade unions - where, in the past, Jews felt very comfortable, but no longer do. The Jewish community in the UK - like most other Jewish communities in the western world - does have a well-organized system of political representation and lobbying. From the Board of Deputies to BICOM to the Jewish Leadership Council and the Community Security Trust, the community is not lacking in formal representation. Jews in the UK have worked hard during the past century and have moved up the political and socioeconomic ladders in a way which any immigrant group would do well to copy. And it is quite logical that they should use their connections and their resources to support and promote causes (support of Israel, fighting anti-Semitism) that are close to their hearts and that are important for them. But unlike their brethren in North America, they seem somehow embarrassed by their success. They are less prepared to openly identify as Jews. They feel threatened by their environment, and if anyone outside the community draws attention to their success, they are immediately on the defensive, sure in their belief (as was clearly evident last week) that the next blood libel or pogrom is imminent. In recent years, the Anglo-Jewish community seems to have developed a new paranoia about anti-Semitism that is out of proportion with reality. Yes, there are plenty of anti-Semites out there; yes, the border between being critical of Israel and being anti-Semitic is becoming increasingly difficult to demarcate, and yes, there is a new anti-Semitism of the Left and from some Islamic groups that is completely different from the right-wing, racist anti-Semitism of the past. But it is not threatening their continued existence as a distinct ethnic community in this great liberal democracy. The Anglo-Jewish community, despite its shrinking numbers, remains a strong, vibrant, successful community, that knows how to stand up for itself and for Israel. It would be even stronger were it to be more inclusive of the many pro-Israel groups on the left of the political continuum (such as the J Street coalition in North America) which are presently excluded. But that criticism aside, it is a community which should have moved on from the traditional siege mentality of the galut Jew, but to which it seems to have returned. I left the UK for Israel many years ago, not because of anti-Semitism, but because I believed then, as I still do, that Israel is the only place where a Jew can fully express himself and - despite all its problems and conflicts - live a more complete life. If indeed the Anglo-Jewish community feels so threatened today and can be so shaken up because of the evil intent of one TV producer, there is plenty of space and opportunity waiting for them here in this vibrant, dynamic country of the Jewish people. That way, they can use their many skills and positive attributes to contribute to the future of the Jewish people instead of exerting all their energies and invective on those with whom they disagree - from within and without. The writer is professor of political geography at Ben-Gurion University and editor of the International Journal of Geopolitics.

Related Content

Trump ban
August 18, 2018
Record number of Jewish voters will reject Trump in November

By HALIE SOIFER