Look who's talking about 'invented' peoples!

Yalla Peace: If Newt Gingrich wants to talk about national identities with no historical record, he need look no further than his own country - the United States.

December 13, 2011 23:46
4 minute read.
Newt Gingrich [file]

Newt Gingrich 311 (R). (photo credit: REUTERS)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


In his bid to pander to Jewish American voters and demonstrate that he is closer to Israel than most Israelis, Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich declared that Palestinians are an “invented people.” Gingrich, while being interviewed on a right-wing American Jewish cable TV program, said that they were just “Arabs” and had never existed as a people prior to 1948.

But in a demonstration of how Gingrich is merely pandering for Jewish votes, and that he is not completely stupid, he had a spokesman explain later that he is “committed” to the creation of a Palestinian state as a part of a solution to the century-long conflict.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

American politicians long have exploited Israel as a means of attracting votes and money. Viewing the Jewish community as a bank plays into the pernicious stereotype that all Jews are wealthy.

And while I think most American Jews are smart enough to see through Gingrich’s ignorance – although they are not quite good enough to marry Israelis, according to some right-wing Israeli politicians – what Gingrich said is offensive and racist.

First of all, there’s the statement itself. What does it mean that the Palestinians are an “invented”? That they didn’t live in Palestine prior to 1948? Is he calling irrelevant the fact that my father was born in Jerusalem and that his family goes back more than 15 generations there? Secondly, when was Israel ever a nation? More than 2,000 years ago? And what kind of nation was it? Was it democratic? Where Jews the first inhabitants of Palestine? Using logic such as Gingrichs’, many anti- Semites can and do argue that Israelis are an invention, too.

The people who should be most offended are Americans. If we are going to talk about an “invented” people and nation, what fits the bill more than America, which was “invented” by pilgrims who fled Europe and then, after being welcomed by the Native American “Indians” proceeded to steal the Native Americans’ lands for themselves. They then confined the Native Americans on “reservations” only recently giving them compensation and special privileges, like operating casinos.

IS THAT what Israelis want in an American president? An idiot willing to say anything for money and votes? How dependable would Gingrich really be in defending Israel if he so easily panders to popular whims? Every candidate for major national office panders to Jewish voters. If I were Jewish, I’d be insulted.


The far Republican Right panders to Jewish and Israeli interests more than any American political group and they are most closely involved with the Christian Evangelical movement.

And what do Christian Evangelicals believe? Well, they believe that the messiah will not come until Israel is established and the Temple is rebuilt in Jerusalem.

But do they believe that Jews will be treated any differently than other non-Christians afterwards? No. In fact, while they support Israel for that very fundamental Christian belief, they also believe in “Part B” of their Book of Revelation: that when the messiah does return, he’ll only take true Christians and everyone else, including Jews, will burn in hell.

As far as fundamentalist Christian support for Israel is concerned, the 800-pound gorilla in the room is that they view Israel as a means to an end. They can’t have the “rapture” unless Israel achieves its goals. But, to be saved, Jews will have to also embrace Jesus as the messiah and the Christian religion, which in effect means renouncing their own Judaism.

Personally, as a Christian, I have a strong belief in the fundamentals of the Jewish religion.

Though I am not a Jew (I’m married to one) I see Jews and Christians as being children of the same God and spiritual belief structure.

Christians would not be here were it not for Judaism.

But I don’t think pandering to get votes is a good way to build a foundation for peace in the Middle East.

The only answer to the Arab-Israeli conflict is to eliminate the fanatics and extremists who exist on both sides. And among those fanatics, at the head of the line, stands Gingrich, an American politician who is weighed down with more baggage than Ben-Gurion Airport.

The only “invented” person here is Newt Gingrich – a phony, shallow politician who has proven that there is nothing he won’t say to claim power in the United States.

The writer is an award winning columnist and radio talk show host. He can be reached at www.RadioChicagoland.com.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Protesters participate in a demonstration against antisemitism in Parliament Square in London
November 21, 2018
NYPD's top cops: This is how we should combat violent antisemitism