No Holds Barred: Getting away with murder: Obama and the GOP’s vacillation on Syria

I was therefore shocked to hear Obama reverse course and say that time was not pressing to punish Syria.

September 2, 2013 21:25
Protesters demonstrate against strikes on Syria, at the U.S. embassy in Amman, August 31, 2013.

Assad supporters Amman 370. (photo credit: Reuters)

As a past critic of US President Barack Obama’s passivity in the face of Syrian slaughter, I was immensely impressed with his forcefulness in holding Syrian President Bashar Assad accountable for the use of sarin gas.

On the contrary, it was Republican opposition to Obama’s plans to punish Syria for gassing children that was so sorely disappointing, to say the least. Is there any greater justification for attacking a country’s military than when it engages in mass murder of children? And yes, I know the objections. It might not be productive in stopping Assad’s regime, the strategic objectives need to be more clearly defined. Presidents can’t be cowboys and attack without Congressional approval and United Nations support.

Afghanistan is still a mess, do we really need further Middle Eastern entanglements? And, of course, America is near broke.

But towering above all these considerations were the bodies of hundreds of dead children. How do you signal to Syria and all those who would follow its example, especially Iran, that using nerve agents against innocent people will never be tolerated.

I was therefore shocked to hear Obama reverse course and say that time was not pressing to punish Syria, that he would seek Congressional approval and wider support for his strike.

Let’s be clear: If the gassing of children is not an urgent matter than nothing is. Timing is everything. When the Jewish lobby in World War II asked US president Franklin D.

Roosevelt to bomb the tracks to Auschwitz, people were being gassed at a rate of 15,000 per day. Waiting one week would cost the lives of another 100,000 people.

In Syria, the numbers are smaller though still horrific. Already 100,000 dead. But would we tolerate even another 400 kids being gassed? And if you are going to insist on Congressional approval – which neither Reagan, when he attacked Libya, nor Clinton when he attacked Afghanistan and Sudan, sought – then at least call Congress back from recess.

In the Jewish community we often speak of how, during the Holocaust, not many people gave a damn as six million Jews were rapidly exterminated. So how can we as a community afford not to speak out when Arab children are gassed? Where is the outrage? I’m not for putting boots on the ground in Syria. I’m just as weary as other Americans because of Iraq and Afghanistan – and especially the ingratitude shown by so many Muslim countries that we liberated – to see American men and women die to create Islamist countries that are not fully committed to liberal democracy. I also know that America right now can’t afford much.

Our national debt is a crisis of its own.

But we sure as heck can afford a few dozen cruise missiles and we sure as heck can bring the war straight to Assad’s doorstep by destroying his presidential palaces so he’s forced to live like the animal he is in subterranean shelters. Furthermore, The Wall Street Journal suggested in an editorial last week that we can use our missiles not just for Obama’s declared “shot across the bow,” which suggests that we won’t hit any substantive targets, but instead strike the six airfields being most used by Syria’s Air Force and effectively ground their war planes from doing further harm.

One thing we cannot do is play politics where people’s lives are concerned. This is not a time to be doing the all-American blood sport of Republican versus Democrat.

I don’t give a damn why Obama wants to strike Syria – whether it’s to salvage his credibility on his self-declared “red lines,” to show Iran that he’s serious, or to protect his legacy as someone who did not sit back while children were murdered – his intention is immaterial. All that matters is the Biblical imperative: “Thou shalt not stand idly by the blood of your neighbor.”

We must stop the butcher in Damascus from killing more innocent Arabs. On this, Obama is absolutely right and I’m mystified why any Republican would oppose him.

One of the principal reasons I ran for Congress as a Republican was disappointment in my liberal friends (and coming from the worlds of academic and media most of my friends are staunchly anti-Republican) in not being fully committed to fighting evil.

Palestinians, they told me, should of course not be blowing up Israeli buses. But you need to see it from their perspective.

They’re humiliated with check points and road blocks. To which I always respond, there is no justification whatsoever for targeting children, excuses be damned.

Is it any different when the children who are being targeted are Arab, or Kurdish, or Syrian? They are equally God’s children.

And Republicans have been great at making that point strongly, especially in the case of Saddam Hussein. Yes, we’re all Iraq-weary.

But I supported the overthrow of Saddam and thought it a great moment in American history because he had murdered tens of thousands of children with mustard gas at Halabjah in April 1988. So where are the Republican voices of outrage now, when Assad is doing the same thing? In America we play politics with roads, and subsidies, and unemployment – all important issues. But when it comes to “Never Again,” we have to speak with one voice. “Never again” means just that. Never, ever, ever again. That the world will never again tolerate the mass slaughter of civilians by monsters like Assad. That civilization will never sit passively while brute thugs assail and slaughter the innocents en masse.

If you use poison gas you are going to be hit by a Mack truck.

For goodness sake, let’s all get on the same page about this. Obama has, of late, been exemplary in taking the lead on punishing Syria for atrocities. US Secretary of State John Kerry even more so. Please, don’t falter now. Get your backbone back. “Do not murder” means just that. The Ten Commandments are not Democratic or Republican or American or Islamic. They are universal, accepted by all nations at all times.

It’s the 21st century, people. It’s time we finally get serious about stopping mass murder or our passivity will make us complicit.

The author has been coined “America’s Rabbi” and is founder of This World: The Jewish Values Network, which promotes universal Jewish values in the culture. He has just published The Fed-Up Man of Faith: Challenging God in the Face of Tragedy and Suffering. Follow him on Twitter @Rabbi Shmuley.

Related Content

An aide whispers to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, with Moshe Kahlon in the foreground
August 24, 2019
Moving beyond the politics of fear


Cookie Settings