It isn’t surprising that the US and the other five powers signed a deal with
Iran on Saturday. Over the past few weeks, US President Barack Obama and
Secretary of State John Kerry made it clear that they were committed to signing
a deal with Iran as quickly as possible.
And it isn’t surprising that the
deal these overeager leaders signed with the world’s leading state sponsor of
terrorism makes the world a much more dangerous place than it was before the
agreement was concluded.
With the US and its allies far more eager to
reach an accord with Iran on its illicit nuclear weapons program than Iran was,
it was obvious from the outset that any deal ultimately reached, at least as
long as these negotiating conditions remained in force, would facilitate rather
than inhibit Iran’s quest to build a nuclear arsenal. And indeed, the sanctions
relief that Iran has gained simply by signing on the dotted line will be
sufficient to buffet the Iranian economy through a successful nuclear weapons
Iran will achieve nuclear capability while enriching itself through
the deal because the deal gives Iran sanctions relief without requiring Iran to
make any irreversible concessions. Indeed, Iran just received the international
community’s permission to continue to enrich uranium, keep all its nuclear
installations open and build new centrifuges.
While the deal isn’t
surprising in and of itself, Obama’s decision to conclude it now makes clear the
true goal of his foreign policy. To understand that goal, it is first necessary
to consider an aspect of the deal that, on the surface, makes little
The negotiations with the Iranians that culminated in Saturday
night’s agreement went on for a year.
And yet, the final deal reflects
Iran’s opening positions.
JPOST VIDEOS THAT MIGHT INTEREST YOU:
That is, over the course of the entire year,
American and European negotiators were not able to move Iran’s positions one
So what has the Obama administration been doing for the past year?
Since Iran’s positions were the same all along, why didn’t they sign this deal a
year ago? The US’s strength relative to Iran did not diminish significantly
since a year ago. So the US didn’t need this agreement more now than it did a
Clearly, Obama did not spend the last year trying to build
domestic American support for a deal that enables the regime that calls daily
for the annihilation of America to become a nuclear power. With Iran building
military bases all over Central and South America, Obama never bothered trying
to make the case to the American people that they would be more secure with this
regime in possession of the capacity to kill millions of Americans with one
Obama never stood before the Congress to explain how a deal that
gives America’s Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval to Iran’s illicit nuclear
weapons program advances US national security. He never explained how allowing
Iran to continue to enrich uranium decreases the likelihood of war.
what did Obama need the last year for? If he wasn’t concerned with getting a
less dangerous deal, and he didn’t care what the American people though about
his facilitation of Iran’s nuclear weapons program, what prevented him from
okaying the agreement last year? To ascertain the answer, it is worth
considering Finance Minister Yair Lapid’s comments Sunday morning. Beyond noting
the nuclear deal’s danger to Israel’s security, Lapid said, “I am worried not
only over the deal but that we have lost the world’s attention.”
indeed, Israel has lost the world’s attention. Its appropriately deep concerns
over Iran’s nuclear behavior were belittled, ignored and derided, first and
foremost by the Obama administration. Worse than belittling Israel’s concerns,
which are completely shared by the Sunni Arab world, Obama and Kerry have
castigated as warmongers those Americans who agree with Israel’s concerns and
have attacked them as traitors who seek to push America into an unnecessary war.
At the same time, they have presented the dispute as one of Israel against the
rest of the world, ignoring that the Sunni Arab world shares Israel’s
Statements to this effect from US officials have been legion
since the details of the deal were first divulged to Israel and the Gulf States
by the French and the British three weeks ago.
The brazenness of these
anti-Israel statements points to the main action that Obama and his advisors
have engaged in for the past year, while not moving Iran a millimeter from its
opening position at the nuclear talks.
Over the past year, Obama has
engaged in systematically weakening Israel’s position both regionally and in
Washington. Regionally, the US has forced Israel into talks with the
Palestinians that are engineered to weaken Israel strategically and
diplomatically. The US has delegitimized Israel’s legal rights to sovereignty
and self-defense, while effectively justifying Palestinian terrorism as a
legitimate response to Israeli actions – which themselves were perfectly legal.
So, too, the US has given a green light to the EU’s illegal, discriminatory
economic war against Israel.
Beyond that, the Obama administration has
significantly expanded the prospect of war between Israel and Syria by leaking
Israeli strikes against Syrian targets that posed a threat to Israel’s
The US has also weakened Israel’s capacity to take steps short
of war to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear weapons possessing state by
leaking key components of Israel’s covert operations against Iran’s nuclear
In the US, the Obama administration has targeted Israel’s
American supporters. This has been advanced, first and foremost, by actively
weakening AIPA C. As Lee Smith explained in Tablet, the administration has taken
three key steps to neutralize AIPA C as an effective force in
It has supported J Street and so legitimized anti-Israel
Obama appointed outspoken critics of the US-Israel alliance
to key positions in his national security team. First and foremost in this arena
was his appointment of Chuck Hagel to serve as defense
Finally, Obama discredited AIPA C, painting it as an
unthinking warmonger by forcing the group to lobby Congress to support his
helter-skelter rush to war against Syria. The coup de grace was Obama’s sudden
abandonment of his plans to bomb Syria, which left AIPA C high and dry, looking
like an anti-Semitic caricature of itself.
The culmination of this long
process of delegitimizing Israel as a warmongering, ungrateful ally and its
supporters as turncoats who are forcing the US to endanger itself for the
benefit of the Jewish state was the administration’s hysterical campaign against
Israel and its supporters in the lead-up to Saturday’s signing ceremony in
Geneva. Everyone, from the White House to Kerry, accused Israel and its
supporters of trying to force the US to fight an unnecessary war.
consider Obama’s decision to wait for a year to sign the deal that enables Iran
to become a nuclear power in the context of his main activities over the past
year, we understand his foreign policy.
His goal is not to prevent Iran
from becoming a nuclear power. It isn’t even to facilitate a rapprochement
between America and Iran. The goal of Obama’s foreign policy is to weaken the
State of Israel.firstname.lastname@example.org
Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>