(photo credit: Associated Press)
If America’s Middle East position collapses in the forest will anyone hear it? The answer is either ‘no,’ or ‘just barely.’ As I’ve predicted, Russia is coming back into the region and it is going to play a very bad role. Moscow is linking up with the emerging Islamist alliance of Iran, Syria, Hamas and Hizbullah.
Meanwhile, the Obama administration praises Russia for allegedly supporting sanctions against Iran. Russian support, at best, consists of throwing a bucket of fluid over the sanctions’ plan to water it down.
Back in the real world – the Middle East, not Washington – let’s begin with Syria. The Obama administration says it is going to pull Syria away from Iran, but the two countries are coming closer together. Syria’s open goal is to pull the US away from Israel, but meanwhile it is finding still another ally to back its ambitions.
The recent visit of Russia’s President Dimitry Medvedev with a huge entourage was a major step toward reestablishing the old Soviet-Syria relationship. There were broad economic talks, including the possibility of Russia building a nuclear reactor for the Syrian dictatorship.
According to Mikhail Margelov, chairman of the Russian parliamentary foreign liaison committee, quoted in the Syrian newspaper Tishrin, May 12, the visit “is a clear indication to everyone in the Middle East region and on the regional and international level that Syria was and will remain a strategic partner to Russia...”
This includes a new round of arms sales to Syria, which presumably will be paid for largely by Iran.
Even if the alliance remains limited, it will further encourage Iran and Syria to be covertly aggressive and hard line while sending still another signal to moderate Arabs that America is on its way down. Clearly, Russia’s refusal to support more sanctions on Iran in any serious manner is part of this calculation.
IS IT a problem for Russia that it faces internal Islamist terrorism but is aligning with Islamist forces? No, not at all. Iran has been careful not to back these revolutionaries in the north Caucasus. Iran even joins Russia in following a policy of supporting Christian Armenia against Muslim-majority Azerbaijan. By working with the Iranians, Russia is reducing the possibility that they will support Islamist rebels against Moscow.
As in so many cases, this strategic factor appears nowhere on the administration’s horizon.
Then there’s Medvedev’s visit to the newest member of the anti-American Islamist alliance: Turkey. In a joint statement, the two countries’ leaders said that Hamas should be part of any regional negotiations. Turkish President Abdullah Gul explained in his joint press conference with Medvedev: “Unfortunately Palestinians have been split into two... In order to reunite them, you have to speak to both sides. Hamas won elections in Gaza and cannot be ignored.”
What Gul wants (Medvedev too?) is for Hamas to dominate the Palestinian unity arrangement. Consider that two sides are competing for leadership of a people. One of them is a fanatical, extremist, terrorist organization committed to permanent warfare and genocide. The other group isn’t exactly wonderful but, at least at present, is somewhere in the ballpark of being peaceable and reasonable.
So the ideal solution is to put them together and let them reach a common program? Not exactly. As for the “elected” argument, it is a matter of public record that Hamas won the election, made a deal for a coalition government and then staged a violent coup to seize full power in the Gaza Strip.
Oh, and did I mention that Russia is talking about building nuclear reactors for both Turkey and Syria? Russia’s bid for renewed power in the Middle East as a rival to US goals and interests is one more thing that US policy is simply not prepared to cope with, or even recognize. For if Moscow teams up with the radical Islamist alliance, especially after Teheran has nuclear weapons, this is going to worsen considerably an already gloomy strategic picture for the West.
But on top of all that, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov made an incredible statement that should send shock waves through US policy-making circles. In calling on the US not to take “any unilateral step against Iran,” Lavrov is trying to restrict American pressures to what Moscow is willing to accept. In other words, he is acting as Iran’s lawyer to tie America’s hands.
Then he added that there were some people in Washington who do not
believe international legislation takes precedence over legislation
passed by the US. In other words, he is asserting a new doctrine in
which, in effect, the UN is a world government and the US has no right
to act on its own without approval.
The Obama administration should act quickly to reject this doctrine.
This is a trap that the administration’s own policy has helped to lay by
saying it doesn’t believe in strong US leadership. The proposed
precedent would institutionalize that limitation in a way that is going
to be very harmful in the future.
The writer is director of the Global Research in International Affairs
Center and editor of Middle East Review of International Affairs and
Turkish Studies. His blog can be read at www.rubinreports.blogspot.com