Letters: June 22, 2017: Coming back

By
June 22, 2017 22:31
3 minute read.
Letters

Letters. (photo credit: REUTERS)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Coming back

I find it amazing that the new settlement being built is named Amichai (“Work begins on Amichai, first new settlement in 20 years,” June 21).

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


My children live in Ma’aleh Levona, which overlooks the area. My grandson, who was a paratrooper, went to India on his post-army trip and was murdered there. His name was Amichai.

I find it amazing that he is coming back by being the first new settlement to be built in two decades, and right under his house.

May we continue to build and have only good things going on.

MADALYN SCHAEFFER
Jerusalem


Ancient gestures



“For better or worse, Israelis and Palestinians are going to have to learn to share the land between the Jordan and the Mediterranean Sea.” These are your words in “Kalkilya’s reality” (Editorial, June 20), and they indicate a relationship in perpetuity.

Are we speaking here of antagonists who are somehow in an ethically symmetrical relationship that we should embark on a partnership of learning? It sounds very much like suicide, not learning. In fact, what do we as Jews have to be taught about tolerance, about acceptance of strangers (if they accept our claims to nationhood in our land), about an non-bloodthirsty way of living? Forgive me if I forgo such a learning process with a people whose religious principles forbid that Jews have an independent state in the Jewish homeland, who preach and indoctrinate the concept that it is morally justified to kill Jews, and even praiseworthy.

The position we must begin with is self-respect, not ancient gestures of servility.

PAUL RABOFF
Jerusalem


Views of wisdom

Elazar Stern (“Separating religion and state,” Observations, June 16) possesses a wisdom that seems to go beyond that of Solomon, king of Israel. Precisely what Solomon declines to do, to cut the baby in half, Stern goes ahead and does.

He presumes to separate Judaism from Halacha. He claims to do so in the name of preserving the Jewish nature of the only Jewish state in the world. He would leave us bereft as a state from the boundary of the Code of Jewish Law. In its place, we would have something he calls the culture and traditions of Judaism.

From where exactly does he think these practices come? Clearly, they come from Halacha.

The early Zionists, David Ben-Gurion particularly, recognized clearly who and what defined Judaism; belief was another matter.

When the founders of the state and secular Israeli Jews in general looked for Judaism, it was to halachic Judaism they turned.

May the Creator of Israel protect the Jewish people and the Jewish nation from Elazar Stern’s wisdom.

JOANNE JACKSON YELENIK
Beit Shemesh


With regard to the comments by reader Samuel Dershowitz (“Stern on separation,” Letters, June 20), my grandparents left central Europe in 1938 and, arriving in Rio de Janeiro, helped found a liberal congregation, now the biggest congregation in Rio, affiliated with the Reform movement.

My three daughters are all active in their respective Conservative congregations in Israel. So there you have it: at least four generations of non-Orthodox Jews. (I have high hopes for my granddaughters, but they are still toddlers). This, while too many of my Orthodox friends here have offspring who have left religion completely.

As for the Pew Report, as any fair observer of Jewish life in the Diaspora would argue, non-Orthodox congregations there include more than one population: a core of committed and serious (and religious!) members, and a large second circle for whom this is their only (even if tenuous) connection to Judaism. If these congregations did not exist, the latter group would not have gone Orthodox; it would have left years ago.

For the Jewish people, assimilation is the great threat of our generation.

Let’s try not to score points by playing this card against each other.

HUGO GOTTLIEB
Rehovot

Related Content

August 15, 2018
Election 2018: A Jewish perspective

By DOUGLAS BLOOMFIELD