April 2: A divisive ‘hill of beans’?

The widespread bans on kitniyot in Israel have taken on ridiculous proportions that go far beyond what was practiced by Ashkenazic Jews in Europe for centuries.

By JPOST READERS
April 1, 2010 21:03
3 minute read.
April 2: A divisive ‘hill of beans’?

letters pink 88. (photo credit: )

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

A divisive ‘hill of beans’?

Sir, – As Michael Freund himself points out in his article, kitniyot bans stem from a time and practice that no longer exists (“In defense of the ‘kitniyot’ ban,” April 1). The widespread bans on kitniyot in Israel have taken on ridiculous proportions that go far beyond what was practiced by Ashkenazic Jews in Europe for centuries. In fact, there were Ashkenazic communities that banned certain kitniyot, while other communities accepted these but banned others. The kitniyot ban was based exclusively on local practice. To maintain a practice and call it a tradition that should be continued is a divisive element in modern Israel and therefore is really not worth a “hill of beans.”

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


    HAIM M. LERNER
    Ganei Tikva

Sir, – I regret that Michael Freund’s article took on a flippant, almost insulting view of the Sephardic traditions by minimizing the case to do away with the kitniyot ban. He made it seem that the main purpose of the desire to ban this Ashkenazi tradition is to make life easier when shopping in the supermarket. He makes it seem that those who eat kitniyot are in some way less dedicated to making sacrifices on behalf of their religious beliefs.

However, he completely misses the point. The point is that the Jewish people are needlessly divided by this unnecessary and outdated ban on kitniyot, posing situations in which even members of the same family are unable to eat at each other's homes. If a Sephardi girl, for example, marries into an Ashkenazi family, she is no longer able to eat at her own parents’ home, since by the overly strict ruling of many Rabbis, even their dishes are now hametz.

I am now Sephardi, as I married a Jew of Iraqi origin, and our home is strictly kosher all the days of the year, including Pessah – but by Sephardi standards. The majority of our friends are Ashkenazi, and some won’t eat in our house on Pessah, even when I am willing to cook without kitniyot for them, and that is an affront that can cause painful rifts.

This issue also perpetuates the separation of Ashkenazim and Sephardim in the area of shidduchim in certain circles, which in turn has implications for much broader splits in our society. Ashkenazim openly claim, without a hint of sensitivity, that they prefer their children to marry “within” the Ashkenazi community, so that there are no complications on Pessah. This creates a feeling of a class system among Jews.  



If we have risen to the occasion in that we are finally able to live together, to fight together, to build together in our own homeland, then it is high time that we break the tradition of separation and become one people in Pessah as well. Next year in an undivided Jerusalem!

   MEIRA OVED
    Jerusalem

Long presidency?

Sir, – In the article “Traveling through time” (Pessah Supplement, March 29), the author states, “In 1877, Benjamin Harrison – who would become president for 12 years – wrote a letter to my great-great-great-great-great-grandfather.”

This sentence is incorrect. Perhaps the author meant to write “who became president 12 years later,” as Harrison was president for only one term of four years from 1889-1893. The only person who ever served as president for 12 years was Franklin D. Roosevelt from 1933-1945. In fact, a constitutional amendment was later passed in 1947 specifically limiting the president to no more than two terms (or eight years) in office.

    MARK RAVREBY
    Jerusalem

Related Content

Letters
August 19, 2018
Letters to the Editor: August 20, 2018

By LETTERS TO THE EDITOR