(photo credit: JP)
Not so academic
Sir, – In “Academic freedom is not academic license” (Right of Reply, May 3), Geoffrey Alderman points out that in times of war, rights may be suspended if expression is traitorous.
The problem in academia today is lies and fabrications used in the service of anti-Israel propaganda.
Many of these lies are put out by academics, and there is no demand for proof of their statements.
There is no reason for academics to avoid the rigor of research when they want to issue political opinions. Let’s call for truth, not censorship.CHANAH SHAPIRA
Sir, – In response to Geoffrey Alderman, I wish to state that I agree
with every word, and especially with the distinction drawn between the
position in time of peace and the position in time of war.
JPOST VIDEOS THAT MIGHT INTEREST YOU:
It has upset me more than somewhat that a professor was permitted to
call for a boycott of the very same university from which he draws his
Something stinks.JULIAN ISRAEL
Sir, – As a former chancellor and vice chancellor of universities in the
UK, I agree with Geoffrey Alderman that some academics in Israel
mistake academic freedom for academic license. However, while these
academics make a lot of noise and need to be exposed, they are a small
proportion of the total academic staff at Israeli universities.
The greater threat to academic freedom in Israel comes not from stupid
academics abusing their position, but from some on the right of the
political spectrum who see those with different views not as critics or
even opponents, but as enemies, and not just of themselves but of the
Alderman’s argument, that the experience of the UK between 1939 and 1945
is a precedent for limiting academic freedom in Israel now, is
inappropriate. The rockets from Gaza are extremely serious and a threat
to Israeli lives, but they are not the Second World War.
The Israeli media publishes a range of views supportive and critical of
Israeli policy. In this context, Alderman’s advice to Israeli academics
not to say anything that may give comfort to Israel’s enemies is absurd.LESLIE WAGNER
Jerusalem Wait for results
Sir, – Gershon Baskin (“Hamas-Fatah reconciliation:
Opportunity or disaster?,” Encountering Peace, May 3) poses 17 basic
questions regarding the PA/Hamas unity agreement. Then, without reliable
answers, he recommends that Israel strengthen the PA prior to
Palestinian elections by immediately expressing its intention to make
peace while accepting virtually all Palestinian demands.
Following that course of action could threaten Israel’s long-term survival.
Far from strengthening the PA, it would suggest that only fear of Hamas
had forced Israel to capitulate. Even worse, if Hamas wins the election,
Israel will find itself bound to an agreement with a terrorist
organization sworn to the country’s destruction.
One single question must be answered before any others can be asked:
Does Hamas acknowledge the right of the Jewish state to exist in peace?
If the answer is yes, then negotiations with a unified Palestinian
leadership can begin. If the answer is no, then all the negotiations in
the world would be pointless.
The Palestinian people will have an opportunity to express their
preferences at the ballot box. If they select Hamas, they will have
forfeited any claim to a peaceful resolution and Israel should no longer
be expected to assist in their state-building efforts. Certainly, no
agreement should be signed until the election results are known.EFRAIM A. COHEN
Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>