Nation-state bill strikes blow to minorities

So the question arises as to whether the nation-state bill is essentially just a declaration, and what – if any – problems does it generate?

By
July 18, 2018 21:29
3 minute read.
Nation-state bill strikes blow to minorities

A man holds up an Israeli flag at the start of a soccer match [Illustrative]. (photo credit: REUTERS)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

Israel is the national home of the Jewish people, and should remain so. But is it necessary today to define the State of Israel as a Jewish nation-state? After all, exactly what sort of state was established in 1948? The Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel clearly states that Israel is the national home of the Jewish people.

Many laws, such as the Law of Return and the Flag, Emblem, and National Anthem Law, demonstrate this clearly. The phrase “Jewish and democratic state” appears in the Basic Laws: “Human Dignity and Liberty” and “Freedom of Occupation,” among other places. Therefore, there is absolutely no need to “anchor” or “strengthen” Israel’s status as a Jewish nation-state. Any researcher examining Israel’s laws from the outside with no prior knowledge would conclude that this was the case, and that this status is in no way in jeopardy.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


So the question arises as to whether the nation-state bill is essentially just a declaration, and what – if any – problems does it generate? 

The stated purpose of the bill, at least according to some of its supporters, is to override the “constitutional revolution” of 1992 and erode the legal interpretation of the Supreme Court that the right to equality applies to non-Jews as well. A law of this sort, which is not balanced by an acknowledgment of absolute equal rights for minorities (in contrast with the balance expressed in the Declaration of Independence), is a law that seeks to alter the status quo rather than safeguard it. The bill clearly has the potential to turn into a “deal-breaker,” jeopardizing the balance between Israel’s identity as the Jewish national home and its identity as a democracy. No other nation-state defines itself in such a way, with no mention of democracy or minority rights.

Clearly, the bill’s real goal is to sabotage the existing ruling of the Supreme Court, according to which Israel’s status as a nation-state does not imply that Jewish citizens have privileges which other citizens do not. There is no better proof for this than the explicit opposition to including the right to equality in the bill.


In addition, a particularly infuriating amendment was added just last week to a clause in the original bill saying, “The state will act to strengthen the connection between Israel and Diaspora Jewry (both in the Diaspora and in Israel).” In light of the fear of the ultra-Orthodox political parties that this clause would be “exploited” in order to grant recognition to non-Orthodox Jewish communities within Israel, the wording was changed to read, “The state will act in the Diaspora to strengthen the connection between Israel and Diaspora Jewry.” This is a clear reference to what goes on, for example, in the Western Wall plaza, and with regard to the conversion issue. Such an amendment in a bill that is supposed to anchor Israel’s status as the national home of all Jews is downright embarrassing, and indeed was met with harsh criticism from Jewish communities worldwide, and for good reason.

If the principle of Israel as a Jewish nation-state is to be fortified and safeguarded, this should be done in the preamble to a constitution (which as of yet, does not exist) or in a basic law that is just and reflects a clear balance between the Jewish and democratic components of Israel’s identity. It should follow the example of the Declaration of Independence, which recognized “complete equality of social and political rights for all non-Jews,” and explicitly called upon the Arab minority “to participate in the building of the state on the basis of full and equal citizenship and due representation in all its provisional and permanent institutions.”

The fact that the bill equates a “Jewish nation-state” with a state that refuses to recognize the equality of members of minority groups who are its citizens also poses a threat to the internal Israeli discourse, already rife with exclusion and hatred of minorities.
Furthermore, it is detrimental to Israel’s fight against the international delegitimization campaign being waged against it. This bill is liable to add fuel to the fire of the accusations against Israel and take one more step toward the erosion of its status as a democracy.

The writer is a researcher and head of the Defending Democratic Values program at the Israel Democracy Institute.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

‘AMERICAN AND Israeli Jews often forget we’re family and intertwined.’
December 18, 2018
Center Field: To reinvigorate Zionism, ‘Z3’ should build ‘identity Zionism’ first

By GIL TROY