A move in the right direction

Adopting a two-year budget in Israel will only strengthen present economic stability.

July 26, 2010 22:25
1 minute read.
netanyahu after 2005 budget vote

bibi 2005 budget 298.88. (photo credit: Ariel Jerozolimski)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

As economic applications become more sophisticated, and governments, at least in the West, recognize the necessity of streamlining their processes to better achieve their mandates of stability and growth, one of the efforts being recommended is the use of longer budget periods.

There is nothing magical about 365 days or indeed any other arbitrary period. At times, people have thought about tying budgets to economic cycles, but they are no longer viewed as predictable.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

The idea of a two-year rather than a one-year budget achieves, in a reasonable way, much that one might wish for. It reduces unnecessary and uneconomic political haggling.

It maintains sufficient flexibility and allows economic developments to play out.

While one must respect Israel’s legislative process, so essential to democracy, it is hard to avoid being at times appalled by the spectacle of “horse trading” that includes legislators, whose economic understanding leaves much to be desired. While this may be democracy at work, it might be better if it were ameliorated by occurring once every two years, perhaps in a calmer environment.

The two-year budget, with a greater aura of professionalism may help this occur.

PERCEPTIONS CHANGE, outlook changes and the ability of a highly professional finance and economic agency or agencies to monitor nuance and anticipate change early enough to steer the budget process toward adjustment is obviously necessary whatever the length of the budget term. Indeed, the two-year budget will emphasize this ability of the government’s professionals to do their job well, and if they succeed, there should be noticeable improvement in economic performance.

Nothing happens without bumps, particularly the installation of a new vision. But here, as the risks are low, they can, and should be regularly and independently monitored. Improved budgetary results should be readily foreseen.

In light of the global economic crisis from which, happily, Israel has been largely but not entirely immune, this would seem an opportune time for it to continue to advance its policies to strengthen present economic stability.

Adopting a two-year budget is a move in this direction.

The writer is an American investor and philanthropist active in Jewish causes.

Related Content

Israeli flag
August 14, 2018
The Nation-State Law: A challenge to be faced