Washington Post says Iran statement on reporter trial is 'puzzling'

WASHINGTON - The Washington Post said on Sunday an Iranian ruling on espionage charges against its reporter Jason Rezaian was "vague and puzzling", and it was not clear whether it included a verdict and sentence.
An Iranian judiciary spokesman said on Sunday a ruling had been issued but that it could be appealed and is not final."We have no further information at this time and it is not clear whether this ruling includes a verdict or a sentence - or even whether its contents have been communicated to Jason or his lawyer," Post Executive Editor Martin Baron said in a statement.
Subscribe for our daily newsletter
Subscribe for our daily newsletter

By subscribing I accept the terms of use

Read all Tweets >