In the meltdown's wake, community bankers find themselves under tighter scrutiny from federal regulators.
By JERUSALEM POST STAFF
First they felt their reputations were stained by the financial meltdown. Now they're paying a price they protest is unfair.
Small bankers are complaining loudly that they had nothing to do with the excesses of big Wall Street firms, freewheeling deals in the mortgage market and risky investments that precipitated the economic crisis.
Still, in the meltdown's wake, community bankers find themselves under tighter scrutiny from federal regulators. They say the $700 billion financial bailout has favored large institutions. And they are upset about a special assessment the government wants to charge to shore up the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation fund, which failed banks are draining.
This all comes as the government, trying to stimulate the economy, pleading with banks - big and small - to lend, lend, lend.
"People on the street should be interested because community banks account for 45 percent of all small business loans," said Camden Fine, president of the Independent Community Bankers of America. "They really are the engines of Main Street, and if you have an overly aggressive and overly harsh examining atmosphere, then that causes the community banks to pull in their horns."
"Criticism of loan portfolios in community banks has become so harsh that community bankers say, 'I'll just stop making loans until this thunderstorm passes,'" he said.
Fine said small banks can turn to other revenue-making practices for a time and wait out the harsh examination environment.
The big bankers say banking examiners have become more prickly with them, too.
"We're hearing from Congress that we need to lend, and we're hearing from examiners to shore up the balance sheets," said Scott Talbott, senior vice president for government affairs at the Financial Services Roundtable, which represents large financial firms. "We are subject to incredible amounts of scrutiny."
Bank consultant Bert Ely said he sees a disconnect between Washington and the banks across America.
"The bankers are saying that they're getting criticized on a lot of loans and that the examiners have gotten tougher," Ely said. "Bankers are telling me that they are lending, but that a lot of the better borrowers don't want to borrow: that people are pulling back, projects are getting postponed, people don't want to buy a new car."
Some small banks did get involved in risky lending practice that led to their demise. Other small banks were too weak to survive the recession. Most of the 40-plus banks that have failed since January 2008 had less than $10 billion in assets. But Fine said they represent only a fraction of the country's 8,000 community banks.
He said more than $10b. of the $17.8b. in losses to the FDIC fund last year came from just one large bank - IndyMac in Pasadena, California. On the other hand, while Seattle-based Washington Mutual Inc. caused a loud thud in September when it became the largest US bank failure ever, it was taken over by JPMorgan Chase & Co. The deal was brokered by the FDIC and didn't cost the fund a dime.
What's really raised the ire of the community bankers, however, is the one-time, emergency assessment that all banks are being asked to pay to shore up the FDIC fund, which is struggling to back deposits in a rising number of failed institutions.
The FDIC board expects bank failures will cost the fund about $65b. through 2013. The law requires the insurance fund to be maintained at a certain minimum level of 1.15% of total insured deposits. Bank failures have sliced the amount in the deposit insurance fund to $18.9b. as of December 31, the lowest level since 1987. That compares with $52.4b. at the end of 2007.
"Why are community banks paying for the sins of Wall Street banks?" Dean Anderson, vice president of Lake Elmo Bank in Lake Elmo, Minnesota, wrote in one of thousands of protest letters the FDIC received over the assessment. "Some community banks will not survive this outrageous assessment. I know it will cost our institution almost $400,000 for this unbudgeted item.... The little guy is always the one who gets hammered and no one seems to care!"
Connie Rohde, vice president at Brenham National Bank in Brenham, Texas, wrote: "For years we community bankers have fiercely competed with the big guys for every deposit we could get to remain in business. These irresponsible banks were making the big profits, while we struggled to stay alive - honestly. And now you are demanding us to bail them out! Can you not feel our frustration?"
The new emergency premium, to be assessed on the 8,305 federally insured institutions on June 30, will be 20 cents for every $100 of their insured deposits. That compares with an average premium of 6.3 cents paid by banks and thrifts last year.
Fine said the problem with the FDIC assessment lies with how it's calculated. It's partly based on the amount of domestic deposits an institution needs insured.
Fine said more than 85% of the money that a community bank uses to conduct its business is from domestic deposits, while the percentage is much lower for larger banks.
"We're getting the short end of the stick," he said.
The assessment comes on top of an increase in regular premiums the FDIC charges institutions every year to insure regular accounts up to $250,000. Starting this month, the FDIC raised the regular insurance premiums to between 12 cents and 16 cents for every $100 in deposits, from a range of 12 cents to 14 cents.
Large banks don't like the proposed FDIC assessment either, but they say every bank, regardless of size, must pay to insure their deposits. They say large banks already are putting more in the pot because some of the fees from two new programs aimed at easing the financial crisis are being diverted into the FDIC fund. And they point out that more small banks than big banks are failing and draining the fund.
"There is a statutory requirement for the FDIC that says they have to treat all institutions of every size fairly. You can't disadvantage one over the other," said Diane Casey-Landry, chief operating officer of the American Bankers Association, which represents both big and little banks. "The reality is that the losses in banks that have been failing and the banks that are slated to fail and cost the deposit insurance fund going forward unfortunately are community banks."
The multibillion-dollar financial bailout is another touchy subject for the small bankers, who say the program has favored big financial institutions over smaller community banks. A majority of the bailout money is in just about 10% of the banks, but it was the bigger institutions that were the first priority for the program.
"Community banks weren't even allowed to try to get the money until about the first of the year," Fine said. "I knew community banks that had applications pending for two and three months that didn't hear anything."
Now, however, some community banks have decided not to apply, and some are even giving bailout money back.
var cont = `Sign up for The Jerusalem Post Premium Plus for just $5
Upgrade your reading experience with an ad-free environment and exclusive content