Ahmadinejad vows 'decisive response' to Israeli attack

"If someone throws a smaller stone, you should respond with a bigger stone” Iranian president says as Russians try to restart nuclear talks.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad 311 (R) (photo credit: REUTERS/Morteza Nikoubazl)
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad 311 (R)
(photo credit: REUTERS/Morteza Nikoubazl)
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad acknowledged the possibility of an Israeli or US strike on his country as real in an interview with Russia Today on Sunday, but said that the Islamic Republic would offer “a decisive response” to such an attack.
“They wish to do it, they want to do it, but they know about our power. They know that we are going to give them a decisive response,” he said. “We have a saying in our language: ‘If someone throws a smaller stone, you should respond with a bigger stone.’ We will defend ourselves within our capabilities.”
RELATED:Opinion: Nuclear deterrence & enemy rationality'Der Spiegel': Mossad behind Iran scientist assassination
Ahmadinejad said that despite recently stepping up construction work on centrifuges which can more effectively enrich uranium, Iran’s objective is to develop peaceful nuclear energy.
“We do not want nuclear weapons for a few reasons... This weapon is inhumane. Because of our faith, we are against it. Our religion says it is prohibited, and we are religious people,” he said.
“Nuclear weapons have no capabilities today. If any country tries to build a nuclear bomb, in fact, they waste their money on resources and, secondly, they create a big danger to themselves.”
He added: “The Americans have nuclear bombs and nuclear weapons. Could they win in Iraq or in Afghanistan? Could nuclear weapons help the Zionist regime win in Lebanon and Gaza? Could nuclear weapons help the former Soviet Union avoid collapse? “Nuclear weapons are the means of the previous century. This century is the century of knowledge and thinking. It is the century of human beings. It is the century of culture and knowledge.”
Meanwhile, Russia said on Sunday that it will look to revive nuclear talks between Iran and the world’s biggest economic and military powers this week, hoping its special relationship with Tehran can help jolt back to life negotiations that some analysts consider “dead in the water.”
Russian Presidential Security Council secretary Nikolai Patrushev is due to meet his Iranian counterpart and Ahmadinejad in Tehran on Monday and is expected to raise a Russian plan to restart the talks that collapsed in January.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told US President Barack Obama in July of Moscow’s “step-by-step” approach under which Iran could address questions about its nuclear program and be rewarded with a gradual easing of sanctions imposed by countries that fear Tehran is seeking nuclear weapons.
Russia backed a fourth round of UN sanctions against Tehran in June 2010 but has criticized tighter measures imposed unilaterally by the United States and the European Union and emphasized its opposition to military action. Therefore Tehran might be more receptive to an approach from Moscow than one from the West.
The E3+3 delegation (representing the United States, Russia, China, France, Britain and Germany) is led by EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton.
“It’s certainly easier for Iran to respond to a Russian gambit than to Western pressure. The E3+3 negotiating efforts with Iran are stuck dead in the water,” said Mark Fitzpatrick, a non-proliferation expert at London’s International Institute for Strategic Studies.
“If Russia’s plan can get Iran to the negotiating table, then great. Talks have to start somehow.”
Not only is Moscow not part of the Western alliance Iran sees as its greatest enemy, it is also involved in developing part of the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program, as builder of its first atomic power plant at Bushehr on the Gulf coast.
“Russia has maintained a long-standing relationship with Iran, effectively it is a partner in Iran’s nuclear program through its construction of the Bushehr nuclear plant, and has never shown the slightest ambition of changing the government of Iran,” said Farideh Farhi, an Iran expert at the University of Hawaii.
Farhi said the “step-by-step” approach mentioned by Lavrov did not appear to be substantively new, and it looked less, not more, likely to work that it had before.
“Tying Iran’s step-by-step moves to reduction of sanctions is something that has not worked and it works even less now that so many sanctions against Iran are unilateral sanctions imposed by the US Congress and cannot be negotiated by representatives of executive branches in both countries.”
While Ahmadinejad maintains the sanctions are having no affect, other officials have started admitting some of the measures – particularly ones that restrict Iran’s access to foreign banks – are hurting the economy.
Click here for full Jpost coverage of the Iranian threatClick here for full Jpost coverage of the Iranian threat
Any new talks are likely to focus on concerns about Iran’s nuclear enrichment which a UN Security Council resolution requires it to stop but which Tehran says it is entitled to do as a member of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Iran’s decision last year to raise the level of enrichment from the 3.5 percent purity needed for normal power plant fuel to 20% worried countries that saw it as a significant step towards the 90% needed for bombs.
Far from reducing its uranium enrichment program, Tehran has stepped it up, announcing in June it would triple its production capacity of higher grade fuel and shift that work to an underground bunker that would be less vulnerable to a military strike.
“Iran will try to persuade Russia and China to accept its precondition of accepting its right to enrichment before sitting down at the table,” Fitzpatrick said. “Russia and China don’t see eye-to-eye with the US and the Europeans, and... Iran will seek to exploit the differences.”
While Tehran has welcomed Russian know-how in developing nuclear power, it has become increasingly frustrated by successive delays in the project which was initially started by Germany’s Siemens in 1975, but has yet to start working.
Some Iranians suspect the latest delays might be a deliberate attempt by Russia to gain leverage over Tehran, a view shared by Russian analyst Fyodor Lukyanov.
“I can imagine that there are some real technical problems, but also since this is the only means now at Russia’s disposal to influence Iran maybe Russia is trying to push Iran toward a more constructive position by finding new ‘technical problems,’” said Lukyanov, editor of the journal Russia in Global Affairs.
Russia has also declined to deliver an S- 300 air defense system Iran had ordered, winning applause from Israel which said the arms could help fend off any future strike but infuriating Tehran. Medvedev banned the export in September, saying it would violate the expanded UN sanctions.