SEYMOUR BRODSKYJerusalemCrocodile tearsSir, – Having just read Julia Chaitin’s article (“Seeking a responsible adult,” Comment & Features, March 30), I must answer her ridiculous claims and criticisms.Chaitin equates Israel’s response to non-stop rockets and terrorists fire as if they were equally bad.What utter rubbish! She knows, as all normal-thinking people, that if Gazans stop firing on us there would be no retaliation from the IDF.She cries crocodile tears for the poor besieged Gazans who can only import goods (and arms, secretly) for a few hours a day.Shame! What other country would allow anything to cross its border into Gaza, which is defined by Israel as a hostile entity? We should close the border completely and throw away the key.Let Gazans use the Egyptian crossings for their imports. They have no grudge against Egypt.JUDY PRAGERPetah TikvaLove me or elseSir, – Shmuley Boteach, in “Can love exist without hate?” (No Holds Barred, March 29), hits the nail on the head. However, I would add to his analysis of Jesus and Christian love the following observation: Even if turning the other cheek is meant to be taken literally, the idea of love existing without hate or vengeance is contradicted by the New Testament, which says that those who do not accept Jesus will go on to eternal suffering in hell. Is this love or hate? Unconditional love, which Boteach and the Torah seem to reject, is also rejected by the New Testament if it says sinners are to be punished with eternal torment.JACOB CHINITZJerusalemDo it for yourselfSir, – Judy Montagu’s “The ring of truth” (In My Own Write, March 30) is admirable in that the writer tries so hard to take no moral stand. What a pity that at the end she had to spoil it and use the word “delightful” in her assessment of a Mark Twain essay on lying, which includes the line “to lie for others’ advantage and not our own.”Everything we do, whether it be telling blatant lies, white lies, deceiving by omission, stealing or donating our time and money to charity at every given opportunity, is done purely for selfish reasons. There is no such thing as a selfless act.Ayn Rand espoused “the virtue of selfishness,” and Shakespeare got it right when he wrote “to thine own self be true.” Applying the latter to understand the former is also to understand our every motivation and that the only person one can ever possibly betray is one’s self.
STEPHEN DUZZYHaifaHebrew nuanceSir, – Judy Siegel-Itzkovich (“Reigniting burnt-out doctors,” Health, March 27), in her presentation of a Hebrew-language book about returning genuine caring to medical practice, writes that Mashiv Haruah, the first two words of the title, “come from the start of the daily Jewish prayer for rain during the winter that refers to bringing back the wind followed by rain.”This is not accurate. The word mashiv, from the Hebrew root nashav, means to blow; the phrase means “He causes the wind to blow.” It has nothing to do with return. She confused this word with that from the root shuv, meaning to return.The authors of the book apparently were aware of this difference; therefore, on the cover of the book they vocalized the word to inform the reader that the title is a play on words.
EPHRAIM HALIVNI Jerusalem