US federal court reassesses Trump's controversial travel ban

Thousands of travelers await the court's final decision regarding the travel ban, which seeks to prohibit the entrance of immigrants from seven majority-Muslim countries into the US.

February 8, 2017 08:34
1 minute read.
holds a sign in support of Muslim family members as people protest against U.S. President Donald Tru

A girl holds a sign in support of Muslim family members as people protest against U.S. President Donald Trump's travel ban on Muslim majority countries.. (photo credit: REUTERS)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


Three US federal court judges weighed on Tuesday the fate of the controversial immigration ban US President Donald Trump has pushed to reinstate in recent weeks.

The panel of three appellate judges from the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit reportedly grilled a Justice Department lawyer regarding the information and evidence Trump had used in forming his decision on the ban. They also questioned him about the extent of power the president should have in this particular case as well as others.

According to the New York Times, judges also interrogated Washington's solicitor general about what evidence he could offer to illustrate religious discrimination. They also asked whether last week's freeze on the ban was too general.

Last Friday federal court judge James Robart temporarily put a halt to the immigration ban, which Trump has branded as crucial to US security, in a move that many exalted over.
Protesting in Jerusalem against the Trump immigration ban to US on Jan. 29, 2017 (credit: MARC ISRAEL SELLEM / THE JERUSALEM POST)

The president angrily reacted to Judge Robart's decision in a series of tweets, denouncing him as a "so-called" judge and telling reporters that "we'll win. For the safety of the country, we'll win."

The ban in question will prohibit the entrance of citizens of seven majority-Muslim countries into the US and has sparked controversy within the United States and across the world, evoking an outcry of resistance and criticism from many who deemed the move as racist and as opposed to core American values.

The court said that a final decision on the matter is slated to be determined "probably this week," with Judge Michelle Taryn Friedland promising a quick consideration.

Tens of thousands of travelers whose visas were revoked by the initial executive order and then restored are now waiting for the court to make a decision that could have a significant and direct impact on them once more.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

June 20, 2019
Group that propelled AOC to upset victory working to unseat Eliot Engel


Cookie Settings