Israel’s one-way discussion on West Bank sovereignty

Nations' diplomats explain domestic politics to foreign audiences. It doesn’t mean those audiences offer their approval or consent.

February 14, 2018 08:47
2 minute read.
Israeli Ambassador to the US Ron Dermer

Israeli Ambassador to the US Ron Dermer. (photo credit: MIKE SEGAR / REUTERS)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


WASHINGTON – When Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told members of his party on Monday that he has been “talking for some time” with the Trump administration about Israeli sovereignty in the West Bank, what did he mean?

Taking him literally at what he said, he likely meant that Israel’s top diplomat in Washington, Ron Dermer, has been explaining over the course of months to White House staff the reasoning behind Israel’s current policy in the disputed territory – and its growing political appetite for sovereignty there.

Of course the Israelis have spoken with the Americans about potential annexation of the West Bank, in whole or in part. But that doesn’t mean the Americans have responded affirmatively.

This is the job of any diplomat: to explain, to advocate and when necessary to fight for the positions of their government. In the Trump administration, Israeli diplomats see an American government more amenable and potentially friendly to Netanyahu’s conservative positions. It should come as no surprise then that the Israelis have been gauging White House officials in recent months to see just how far they are willing to go in supporting the growth of Israel’s presence in the West Bank.

If anything is surprising, it is the US administration’s public push back on Monday against the suggestion it has in any way consented to West Bank annexation. President Donald Trump’s peace team demanded Netanyahu walk back his comments, which came just days after Trump in an interview characterized settlement activity as an impediment to peace with the Palestinians.

In response to Netanyahu’s public remarks, critics assumed the administration had privately plotted an Israeli takeover of the coveted territory – convinced that Trump would, in the end, give up on half-hearted peace efforts and heed Netanyahu’s political needs. To the contrary, the White House “peace team” – led by Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law, and Jason Greenblatt, his special representative for international negotiations – remains adamantly at work on a plan for Israeli-Palestinian negotiations they insist will bring Ramallah back to the table – and demand serious concessions of Jerusalem.

The peace team’s sharp response to Netanyahu was telling of their current thinking. If the White House does not want to be associated with Israeli contingency plans to annex the West Bank, then it stands to reason their plan will oppose Israeli sovereignty there.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

May 19, 2019
Iceland's Eurovision group Hatari posts Palestinian flag on Instagram