Why the PA wants full control of Gaza’s weapons and security

The PA wants to prevent a scenario in which it takes responsibility for Gaza but militant groups can still carry out attacks on Israel.

November 20, 2017 19:42
1 minute read.
A man holds a picture of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas during celebrations after Hamas said it

A man holds a picture of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas during celebrations after Hamas said it reached a deal with Palestinian rival Fatah, in Gaza City October 12, 2017. (photo credit: REUTERS/SUHAIB SALEM)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


As the Palestinian Authority makes an effort to retake control of the Gaza Strip, a major concern for the Ramallah- based governing body is the future of arms and security in the small territory.

The PA has been demanding complete control of Gaza’s weapons and full responsibility for its security. “I will not accept reproducing the Hezbollah model,” PA President Mahmoud Abbas told Egyptian television in early October, adding in an interview a few weeks later, “There is no room for the presence of militias [in Gaza].”

One of the most prominent reasons the PA wants to take control of Gaza’s weapons is to prevent a scenario in which it bears responsibility for the Strip while militant groups such as Hamas and Islamic Jihad can still carry out attacks on Israel.

Such a scenario concerns the PA because of the possibility of Israel holding it liable for an attack launched by Hamas or Islamic Jihad against the Jewish state.

For instance, just two weeks ago, after the IDF demolished a cross-border attack tunnel, killing 10 members of Islamic Jihad and two from Hamas, Islamic Jihad threatened to carry out a revenge attack against Israel.

In response, instead of saying Islamic Jihad would be held accountable, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Hamas, the current sovereign in Gaza, would bear responsibility for any such attack.

“We hold Hamas responsible for any attack against us launched or organized from the Gaza Strip,” Netanyahu told a weekly cabinet meeting on November 12.

In addition, Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories Maj.-Gen. Yoav Mordechai said both Hamas and Islamic Jihad would be held accountable for any attack undertaken by Islamic Jihad.

There is no doubt that the PA leadership is wondering if Israel would apply the same standard to it, if it were to become the sovereign or responsible party in Gaza, and one of the armed groups there were to launch an attack against the IDF or against Israeli civilians.

In such a situation, would Israel take action against the PA? Or would Israel target the specific groups that carried out the attack? According to Netanyahu’s comment, it seems possible the PA could find itself paying the price for an attack it did not perpetrate.

Related Content

Tzipi Hotovely speaks at the Jerusalem Post annual conference in New York
June 17, 2019
Hotovely: Time to apply Israeli law in Area C


Cookie Settings