Likud bill seeks to open door to anti-BDS lawsuits

Legislation would also make it easier to sue settlement boycotters.

By
July 26, 2017 15:27
1 minute read.
Knesset

sraeli lawmakers attend a vote on a bill at the Knesset, the Israeli parliament, in Jerusalem February 6, 2017. (photo credit: AMMAR AWAD / REUTERS)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

New legislation backed by Strategic Affairs Minister Gilad Erdan would allow anyone harmed by calls to boycott Israel or the settlements to sue without proof of damages.

Erdan said his “policy is to send [boycotters] a sharp message: Their actions against the State of Israel will incur a financial cost.”

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


The bill, drafted by Likud MK Yoav Kisch, brings back an article from the 2011 Boycott Law that the Supreme Court canceled.

The Boycott Law stated that anyone who incurred damages from boycotts or calls to boycott Israel or any geographic area of Israel – meaning boycotts of the West Bank, among other places – by groups or individuals could sue without proof of damages. The Supreme Court struck the waiver of proof of damages.

Since the Boycott Law was passed, no one has sued invoking it, and the new bill hopes to change that.
Gilad Erdan announces the launching of a new campaign to combat BDS (credit: Anastasiia Davydova)

The legislation seeks to take into account the problems the Supreme Court had with the previous article not requiring proof of damages in that it applies only to damages claims of up to NIS 100,000 and not to a one-time expression of support for boycotts.

Kisch said that in light of the BDS and other anti-Israel movements’ activities, it is important to fight back.



“The Boycott Law that was meant to prevent boycotts against Israel was emptied of meaning by the Supreme Court’s ruling,” he said. “This amendment will give the Boycott Law real tools that will, for the first time, allow [injured parties] to sue groups that call to boycott Israel.” 

Related Content

Ireland's Foreign Minister Simon Coveney speaks during a news conference in Dublin, Ireland
July 11, 2018
Israel summons Irish ambassador over settlement criminalization bill vote

By TOVAH LAZAROFF