I run across the oddest comments by various people about the supposed erosion of freedom in the United States.  It reminds me of Desmond Tutu.  A few years ago he was recorded in a Newsweek web interview where he made the following statement:  “I was teaching in Jacksonville, Fla., [during an election campaign] and I was shocked, because I had naively believed all these many years that Americans genuinely believed in freedom of speech. [But I] discovered there that when you made an utterance that was remotely contrary to what the White House was saying, then they attacked you. For a South African the déjà vu was frightening. They behaved exactly the same way that used to happen here [during apartheid]—vilifying those who are putting forward a slightly different view.”  Almost every day one can find numerous commentators on TV and in the newspapers making the same sorts of charges.

Meanwhile, particularly over the Christmas holidays but even now, during the summer, I hear silly things about Christianity in the United States such as: “Christianity is under attack on the political, educational and media front.”   So said one John Newby with NewsWithViews, an online site, way back on December 26, 2004.  The same sentiment continues just as shrilly today.  It was not uncommon this past holiday season to hear report after report by religious commentators complaining about negative portrayals of Christians and Christianity in the media, and decrying the work of the ACLU to get Nativity scenes off of public property, and the like.  A search on the web will find various sites devoted to “fighting back” and shouting about how religious freedom is under attack in America. 

            Frankly, people who say such things strike me as being wildly out of touch with reality.  If Tutu’s rights had actually been infringed as he imagined, then that would mean he was arrested, his writings burned, and that he had disappeared into a jail cell.  After all, that is what happened to him in South Africa during Apartheid.   Frankly, I don’t think that’s quite what he faced in Jacksonville.  He seems instead to be simply upset that someone disagreed with him and expressed that disagreement and that somehow his freedom has been infringed as a consequence of that.  Freedom of speech, last time I checked, does not mean protection from having our speech criticized by those who disagree with us.  If he was really being oppressed, I think he would not be allowed to give an interview in Newsweek, nor would we have been able to read his complaint. 

            Likewise, if Christianity were actually under attack in this country, that would mean I wouldn’t find Bibles and religious books weighing down the shelves in the local library, Walmart and Barnes and Nobel.  It would mean that the Christmas wrapping, cards, and trees would not be available any longer come Christmas.  It would mean that the churches that one finds every few blocks would have been converted to museums of atheism and I would have to fear arrest if I muttered “God bless you” when someone sneezed.  The youth groups who regularly go to Christian concerts and listen to loud rock and roll and rap done by famous and relatively well-paid Christian bands would instead be hiding in their basements sharing their hidden MP3s.

            Real persecution against Christians is what happens in those parts of the world controlled by ISIS where they round up Christians and saw their heads off and sell their women into slavery.

            What Tutu seemed to have been bothered by, and what some Christians today seem bothered by, is that there are people who actually dare disagree with them.  Or that someone made fun of them.  Or that someone said a harsh word.  Or that someone argued against their political or religious point of view.  Those who are bothered by public criticism of their words need to grow thicker skins and realize that they are not gods giving pronouncements from Mt. Olympus.

            To me, such public arguing sounds remarkably like freedom at work.  If I hear someone say something that I don’t like or disagree with, I can speak up and tell them they are a bozo.  If I don’t like what someone writes, I can write against them.  I can create a blog, I can pass out flyers, I can write a book or letters to the editor, or leave vicious comments on websites or Facebook.  I can create a website and shout at the world.  And the government will never intervene.  If people are speaking in public, I can heckle them.  That might be rude, but hey, rudeness is part of life.  I think there’s a rather long tradition of heckling in America.         

The story is told of Calvin Coolidge that one night as he was sitting at the dinner table, his young son called him a name.  Calvin just sat quietly, a thoughtful look on his face. His wife glared at her husband in shock.  “Aren’t you going to do something about that?!”

            “Well,” said Calvin.  “If he’s speaking to me as his father, then I suppose I should probably spank him.  But if he’s speaking to me as the President of the United States, he’s got a constitutionally protected right to call me anything he wants.”  Since it is improbable that the people of Jacksonville were Desmond Tutu’s children, I think they can call him anything they want.

            Freedom is a wonderful thing.  But I think that some people have forgotten or fail to notice that they are free, and that they are surrounded by a bunch of other people who are free, too, who might freely take issue with what they say or think or do. Sometimes rudely, even. That’s kind of the nature of freedom.  It means everyone is free, not just me.


Relevant to your professional network? Please share on Linkedin
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this blog article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or viewpoint of The Jerusalem Post. Blog authors are NOT employees, freelance or salaried, of The Jerusalem Post.

Think others should know about this? Please share