Attempt to stop beachside development plan heads to High Court

NGO's attempt to stop beach side construction.

July 27, 2016 18:16
1 minute read.
GIVAT ALIYA BEACH in Jaffa is seen from the balcony of the Peres Center for Peace

GIVAT ALIYA BEACH in Jaffa is seen from the balcony of the Peres Center for Peace. (photo credit: DANNY SAVILLE / WIKIMEDIA COMMONS)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


The cabinet is now considering legislation that could change the Israeli coastline as we know it, yet legal means may put a brake on some of it.

Environmental NGO Adam Teva V’Din – the Israel Union for Environmental Defense – submitted a petition to the High Court on Wednesday to stop a controversial section of Master Plan (TAMA) 1 that would allow increased beachside construction.

The main fear is that the plan would override the Coastal Protection Law, known as TAMA- 13. According to the NGO, it would allow construction in 2,000 hectares of coastal property that is currently protected from construction.

Furthermore, while construction would still be forbidden 100 meters from the waterline, TAMA-1 would allow kiosks and recreational structures to be built up to 30 meters from the sea.

Eli Ben-Ari, an attorney for Adam Teva V’Din who wrote the petition, said that TAMA-1 would “drastically change” the Coastline Protection Law.

The petition also included a point made in a 2014 petition to the court, which pointed out conflicts of interests. The petition states that out of the 19 “agricultural communities” where construction would be allowed under TAMA-1, five are “customers” of Planning Administration director Binat Schwartz’s husband.

At the moment, another coastal worry comes from the impending vote on a section of TAMA-35, nicknamed “Levin’s Law.” It would categorize hotels as a form of “national infrastructure” and simplify hotel construction permits by transferring approval to the Finance Ministry’s National Planning and Building Committee instead of the finance minister.

Amit Bracha, director of Adam Teva V’Din, criticized the “draconian legislation” that has been promoted lately, referring expressly to Levin’s Law. He said that “despite the verbal abuse our representatives have to take,” they will continue to do what they can “to protect the beaches for us and for generations to come.”

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Workers strike outside of the Teva building in Jerusalem, December 2017
December 18, 2017
Workers make explosive threats as massive Teva layoff strikes continue