Global Agenda: Four tough questions for Netanyahu

It would be nice to get some response from the Prime Minister or one of his under-employed underlings to the following inquiries.

April 10, 2009 00:26
3 minute read.
Global Agenda: Four tough questions for Netanyahu

global agenda 88. (photo credit: )


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


After almost seven months of institutionalized anarchy - during which the previous government fell apart, tried to reassemble itself, failed, crumbled, called elections which took three months and produced no clear result, then the non-victor spent weeks constructing a contradictory coalition, Labor flipped and flopped its way in, ministries were multiplied and then divided up, the government was installed, the cabinet managed to somehow squeeze into the cabinet room - after all that, a few questions are in order. Indeed, with the new government immediately picking up the baton from its predecessor with regard to what the British refer to as "helping the police with their inquiries," it would be nice to get some response from the Prime Minister or one of his under-employed underlings to the following inquiries: 1. What's this? This extensive entourage of nobodies doing nothing, this irrational exuberance of excessive ego-mania - what's it all about? Is it not clear even to "leaders" cut-off from anyone other than sycophantic tuches-leckers, that installing this monstrous montage of ministerial meaninglessness has, at a stroke, made this government irredeemably ridiculous in the eyes of the nation? In terms of leadership, it's all over before it's even begun. The government has collectively given the finger to the public; the message has been received. 2.What proposals, initiatives, laws, etc. do you have in mind? After all, while you were struggling with the Herculean task of creating a coalition with your 'natural allies' and finding sufficient jobs for the boys and girls, the record for the number of people fired in a month was broken in successive months. Out here in the real world, jobs are disappearing, credit is unavailable, pensions are evaporating and confidence has collapsed. While you and the rest of the political elite were out to your seven-month, multi-martini lunch, the global and domestic economies fell off a cliff. In every other country, from "communist" China to "capitalist" America, governments have been forced to rethink old verities, move from orthodox to unorthodox polices and generally do things they previously considered impossible or unthinkable. You, however - together with the other "leaders" of the "major" parties - conducted an election campaign in which you refrained from discussing the economy and refused to present any comprehensive plan or set of policies. You avoided revealing who your Finance Minister would be. You pretended that you would mimic the American president by drafting a leading businessman to the post, with you in overall control. In short, you treated the public with contempt and showed you have no understanding of how a parliamentary system of government - the sort we have, not the one you want - actually works. Now you have appointed a very smart guy who has no ministerial experience and no background in economic theory or management - the worst possible combination of qualities. So be it. Yet instead of urgently addressing the immediate crisis, you have deferred action for another three months, whilst you draft a "two-year" budget, which will be based on over-optimistic assumptions regarding economic recovery in 2010, and will therefore be "adjusted" (read razed and rebuilt) down the road. 3.What are your policy ideas? Yours and not ours. It seems that you are still on your tax-cuts-are-the-panacea trip. The budget deficit is exploding as revenues collapse - and you say you want to cut taxes? Fortunately, Shas and Labor wheedled out of you some desperately-needed extra spending, targeted at the desperately-needy (whom you crushed in your last innings). But the old mantras of trickle-down tax cuts and reduced government involvement across the board won't do the job this time. You may believe in smaller government; you may even be right; but even Stanley Fischer, who has been holding the fort in the absence of a functioning government, has realized that most of the economic theory he wrote and preached is in abeyance, at the least, and may have to be consigned to the trash can of history. 4. Don't wait for them to ask. You tell 'em. People don't want smaller government. They believe government should come to their rescue - and that it can deliver salvation. If you don't believe that, have the courage to say so and try and persuade them why you are right and they are wrong - and then tell them what you think they should do according to your by-the-bootstraps survival manual. And good luck in the next Likud Central Committee meeting and the next leadership primary...

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

The Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
April 30, 2015
Teva doubles down on Mylan, despite rejection