Jewish group seeks judicial review of British city’s ban on West Bank goods

Move is a reaction to a nonbinding motion passed by the City Council of Leicester supporting a boycott of products from the West Bank.

By JTA
August 28, 2015 16:49
1 minute read.
Women take part in a rally calling for boycott on US and Israeli products in Sanaa

Women take part in a rally calling for boycott on US and Israeli products in Sanaa. (photo credit: REUTERS)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

A British Jewish group asked the country’s high court to review a municipality’s decision last year to support a boycott of products from the West Bank.

Jonathan Neumann, director of Jewish Human Rights Watch - a group devoted to monitoring efforts to boycott Israel - earlier this month filed with the High Court of Justice of England and Wales a request for judicial review of a nonbinding motion passed by the City Council of Leicester supporting a boycott of products from the West Bank.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


The motion, passed in November and submitted by council member Mohammed Dawood, calls for boycotting such products “in so far as it is legal,” citing Israel’s “continuing to ignore and breach international law” and “continuing its occupation of Palestinian territories.”

But Neumann said the motion was anti-Semitic, because it was a boycott of goods produced by Jews.

“Seventy years after the liberation of Auschwitz and Bergen-Belsen by the British, there are calls in Europe and the United Kingdom to boycott Jews once again,” he said in video taken outside the Royal Court of Justice in London.

The High Court is scheduled to reply next month to the request for review.

Dawood this week told the BBC: “We are very mindful that this was not an attack on a particular faith but is about a particular policy.”



In the past, judicial review has blocked attempts to promote boycotts of Israel in Britain and elsewhere in Europe.

In 2007, the administration of the University and College Union announced it would not implement a motion to boycott Israel passed by a majority of its members because doing so would be “illegal” and “run a serious risk of infringing discrimination legislation.”

In France, members of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) Movement against Israel have been convicted of inciting racial hate based on a 2003 amendment, introduced by a Jewish lawmaker, which forbids discrimination against people or groups of any particular national affiliation.

Related Content

President Reuven Rivlin visits Herzog College for 929 study program
July 16, 2018
929 daily Bible study project to launch in English

By JEREMY SHARON