'NYT' editorial slams anti-boycott law as undemocratic

Article says Israel risks further int'l isolation as a result of law: "No country can be delegitimized if it holds true to its democratic principles."

By JPOST.COM STAFF
July 18, 2011 11:43
1 minute read.
A protester calling for a boycott of Israel

Boycott Israel 521. (photo credit: REUTERS)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The New York Times editorial on Monday slammed the recently passed anti-boycott law as undemocratic.

"Israel’s reputation as a vibrant democracy has been seriously tarnished by a new law intended to stifle outspoken critics of its occupation of the West Bank," the editorial charged.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


RELATED:
A-G will defend Boycott Law despite 'legal difficulties'
Experts: Boycott law won’t withstand Supreme Court test
Editorial: The bad boycott bill

The article states that, while the Times is against boycotting Israel, its opposition to the so-called Boycott Law, "is a fundamental issue of free speech."

The editorial warns that Israel risks further international isolation as a result of the law. "Advocates said the law was needed to prevent efforts to 'delegitimize' Israel, but no country can be delegitimized if it holds true to its democratic principles."

The “Boycott Bill” was approved in its final reading in the Knesset last week, after a plenum discussion that lasted nearly six hours and uncertainty throughout the day as to whether a vote would take place. The bill passed with 47 in favor and 38 opposed.

The new law allows citizens to bring civil suits against persons and organizations that call for economic, cultural or academic boycotts against Israel, Israeli institutions or regions under Israeli control. It also prevents the government from doing business with companies that initiate or comply with such boycotts.



Just hours after the controversial new law was passed, a petition calling for it to be overturned was presented to the High Court by Gush Shalom. Judges ordered the state to respond within 60 days.

Lahav Harkov contributed to this report

Related Content

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
August 31, 2014
Prime minister to Channel 1: I’ll be running again in next election

By Gil Stern Stern HOFFMAN