'Washington Post' to Obama: Make red lines for Iran

Editors urge US president to toward delineating "red lines," which would prompt US military action if passed.

September 8, 2012 04:27
1 minute read.
US President Obama, PM Netanyahu at White House

US President Obama with PM Netanyahu at White House 370. (photo credit: REUTERS/Ibraheem Abu Mustafa)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


The Washington Post's editorial board on Friday urged US President Barack Obama to move closer toward the Israeli demand to set "red lines," which if crossed, could prompt US military action against Iranian nuclear facilities.

Citing ongoing media speculation of a rift between Obama and Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu over Iran, the newspaper's editorial board suggested that more clarity about US policy toward Iran could help heal relations between the two."If Obama really is determined to take military action if Iran takes decisive steps toward producing a bomb... he would be wise to say so publicly" by issuing "a more explicit presidential statement."

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

While the argument contended that there could be dangers to such a declaration, "including that the United States would start down a slippery slope toward war," it nonetheless encouraged the move. Doing so, the editorial argued, "would improve relations with Netanyahu and deter unilateral Israeli action - and it might well convince Iran that the time has come to compromise."

As recently as Thursday night, Defense Minister Ehud Barak acknowledged the divergence in the US and Israeli timetables for potential military action against Iran, saying “the clock is ticking at a different pace.” He nonetheless, hailed US-Israel military cooperation and said he is "convinced that it will continue to be that way in every future test.”

Barak's comments came on the heels of last week's statement by Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs Martin Dempsey that he did not want to be "complicit" if Israel chose to strike Iran's nuclear program.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
August 31, 2014
Prime minister to Channel 1: I’ll be running again in next election

By Gil Stern Stern HOFFMAN