Study: Bad test results often don't reach patients

doctors failed to inform patients of abnormal cancer screenings and other test results 1 out of 14 times.

June 23, 2009 10:30
2 minute read.


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

No news isn't necessarily good news for patients waiting for the results of medical tests. The first study of its kind finds doctors failed to inform patients of abnormal cancer screenings and other test results 1 out of 14 times. The failure rate was higher at some doctors' offices, as high as 26 percent at one office. Few medical practices had explicit methods for how to tell patients, leaving each doctor to come up with a system. In some offices, patients were told if they didn't hear anything, they could assume their test results were normal. "It really does happen all too often," said lead author Dr. Lawrence Casalino of Weill Cornell Medical College. The findings are published in Monday's Archives of Internal Medicine. "If you've had a test, whether it be blood test or some kind of X-ray or ultrasound, don't assume because you haven't heard from your physician that the result is normal," Casalino said. Practices with electronic medical records systems did worse or no better than those with paper systems in the study of more than 5,000 patients. "If you have bad processes in place, electronic medical records are not going to solve your problems," said study co-author Dr. Daniel Dunham of Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine. Dr. Harvey Murff, a patient safety researcher at Vanderbilt University Medical Center who wasn't involved in the study, said the researchers gave doctors "the benefit of the doubt" and still found a significant problem. The researchers chose tests findings in which any doctor would agree patients should be informed. And they gave doctors a chance to explain when they found nothing in medical charts showing patients had been notified of bad test results. The tests included cholesterol blood work, mammograms, Pap smears and screening tests for colon cancer. Failing to inform patients can lead to malpractice lawsuits and increased medical costs, the researchers said. "If bad things happen to patients that could have been prevented, that will lead to higher costs and in some cases considerably higher costs," Casalino said. Medical records of more than 5,000 randomly selected patients, ages 50 to 69, in 23 primary care practices in the Midwest and on the West coast were reviewed by researchers, excluding dying patients and others with severe medical conditions in which informing a patient would be pointless. They surveyed doctors about how their offices manage test results. The offices that followed certain processes - including asking patients to call if they don't hear any news - were less likely to have high failure rates. The study was funded by the California HealthCare Foundation. "Our goal is not to indict physicians," Dunham said. "It's about working smarter and getting processes in place." ___ On the Net: Archives:

Related Content

[illustrative photo]
September 24, 2011
Diabetes may significantly increase risk of dementia