Norway university won't boycott Israel

Norwegian university won

November 12, 2009 18:28
2 minute read.
norway 248 88

norway 248 88. (photo credit: Jerusalem Post staff)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) unanimously voted against an academic boycott of Israel at a meeting on Thursday. Had the proposal passed, NTNU would have been the first Western university to sever ties with Israeli universities. "As an academic institution, NTNU's mission is to stimulate the study of the causes of the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians and how it can be resolved. This means that the university is also dependent on being able to cooperate with Israeli academics and hear their views on the conflict," the 12 board members said in a statement released by the university. The meeting was attended by almost 50 members of the university community, a rare departure from the usual five attendees of board of governors meetings. The journalists, mostly from Norwegian publications, outnumbered the board members. Each voting member made a statement explaining their position during a discussion prior to the vote. While many statements were critical of Israel, they concluded that an academic boycott would not be appropriate. The discussion took less than half an hour, since no one argued in favor of the proposal. "It's always nice to have unanimous votes on a controversial issue, because you don't have a division in the board," said Trond Singsaas, the head of administration at NTNU. "I was surprised that no one defended it," said Agnes Bolsø, an associate professor of cultural studies and one of the original 34 authors of the boycott proposal. "I thought there would be one or two teachers defending it. They were very critical of the occupation, but the thing was there was so much weight on academic freedom, the institution didn't do anything to prevent that. "I find it a bit sad. We all want academic freedom, but there is limited academic freedom for Palestinian academics and for Israelis who are critical of the occupation," Bolsø added. "They were only talking about our freedom, to have no restrictions on my freedom, but the other part's freedom wasn't mentioned... It was a bit narrow of perspective." The boycott proposal was met with denunciation by organizations in Israel, Europe and North America who mobilized against it. International reaction was much more intense than the university had anticipated, Singsaas said. Professor Yossi Ben-Artzi, the rector of the University of Haifa who led the fight by Israeli academics to protest the proposal, welcomed the news from NTNU. "I am glad that justice has won over and welcome the decision that recognizes academic freedom and emphasizes the universal fundamentals of justice and integrity," he said in a statement.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

U.S. President Donald Trump addresses a news conference following Tuesday's midterm congressional el
November 17, 2018
New elections and the Trump peace plan