(photo credit: AP)
JOHANNESBURG — South Africa's president filed a $700,000 defamation suit over a cartoon depicting him with his pants undone, preparing to rape a blindfolded, female figure symbolizing justice, a lawyer said Tuesday.
RELATED:'More than 1 in 3 South African men admit to rape'ANC expects big win in South African elections
Eric van der Berg, a lawyer for the Sunday Times, said notice from the president's lawyers had arrived at the paper's Johannesburg offices Monday.
The cartoon caused a storm when the Times
published it in 2008, two years after Jacob Zuma had been acquitted of rape charges. But van der Berg said Zuma had not followed up on threats to sue until now.
Zuma is claiming 4 million rand (about $570,000) for humiliation and degradation and 1 million rand (about $140,000) for damage to his reputation. His spokesman, Zizi Kodwa, refused to comment Tuesday.
Jonathan Shapiro, who signs his work Zapiro and is among the country's best known political cartoonists, said he stood behind his cartoon and the view he was expressing.
"I will not allow the president to intimidate me," Shapiro told the daily Times
, sister paper to the Sunday Times
The cartoon also showed Zuma's political allies encouraging him as they held down a writhing, screaming figure with a sash identifying her as the "justice system."
It appeared in the newspaper as Zuma's political party led a protest
campaign to have the corruption charges dropped against him. Zuma at the
time was preparing to lead his African National Congress party in
general elections. Prosecutors dropped the charges on the eve of the
vote, and Zuma took office in 2009.
Buti Manamela, then a leader of the Young Communist League, filed a
formal complaint about the cartoon before South Africa's Human Rights
Commission in 2008. The South African Communist Party leader was among
the ANC allies depicted in the cartoon.
The commission concluded that the cartoon, while "probably offensive and
distasteful," did not violate Zuma's constitutional right to dignity or
constitute hate speech.
"The cartoon is a political expression, published in the public
interest, and as such, deserves heightened protection," the commission
ruled. "It has, in fact, stimulated valuable political debate."