Dagan retracts quote that attacking Iran is 'stupid'

Former Mossad head steps away from quote, but does not move away from the substance of his opposition to military action.

July 5, 2012 23:37
1 minute read.

Meir Dagan. (photo credit: Marc Israel Sellem)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Bombing Iran is not the stupidest idea Meir Dagan has heard after all, the former Mossad head made clear in an interview in the recent issue of Lochem magazine, distancing himself from a statement he made earlier this year widely circulated to discredit a possible Israeli military action against Tehran.

"This was a miserable quote that was said absentmindedly, not in public, and which someone quotes all the time," Dagan said in the magazine for disabled IDF veterans. "Let's put the record straight. I think the Iranian nuclear capacity is a threat with strategic implications for Israel. I know the Air Force well enough to know that it will perform successfully any task entrusted to it."

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

While stepping away from that particular quote, Dagan did not – however – move away from the substance of his opposition to military action.

"I do see a nuclear Iran as a problem," he said. "If I believe that a military attack would solve the problem, believe me, I would be in favor. If I thought that an attack would stop the nuclear program, I would be in favor. But what can you do, an attack cannot stop the nuclear program, it can only delay it for a period of time."

Click here for full Jpost coverage of the Iranian threat

Dagan, repeating what he has been saying for months about the military option, said it was necessary for Israel to always consider what would happen the day after an attack, and that this was a discussion that should take place before – not after – military action. He added that he thought the cost of such an attack would be greater than the benefit.

Dagan dismissed, however, the notion that Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu was using the Iranian threat to divert the public's attention from issues such as the social protests and the African migrants.

"I do not agree with the defense minister and prime minister [on Iran], but I do not think they are that cynical," he said. "I believe that when the prime minister raises the Iranian issue he is substantively very concerned about Israel's security, and I do not link that with any other event."

Related Content

Bushehr nuclear Iranian
August 5, 2014
Iran and the bomb: The future of negotiations