'Iranian diplomatic successes legitimize IDF strike'

Hanegbi says NAM summit, expansion of country's nuke program as detailed by IAEA report actually increase legitimacy of a IDF strike.

September 1, 2012 13:24
1 minute read.
Kadima MK Tzahi Hanegbi

311_Tzahi Hanegbi. (photo credit: Marc Israel Sellem / The Jerusalem Post)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

An Israeli military strike has been granted increased legitimacy due to the events of the past week, former minister Tzachi Hanegbi said Saturday at a cultural event in Kiryat Motzkin.

Putting a positive spin on what can be considered Iranian diplomatic victories in the past week - the country's successful hosting of the Non-Aligned Movement summit in Tehran and its continued expansion of an illicit nuclear program as detailed by a new IAEA report - Hanegbi said that the possibility of a military strike could actually have been strengthened.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

Hanegbi, who formerly headed the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, also referenced comments made earlier this week by Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs Martin Dempsey, who called into question Israel's ability to inflict severe and lasting damage on Iran's nuclear facilities through an IDF strike. Dempsey said an attack would "clearly delay but probably not destroy Iran's nuclear program," but added that the "international coalition" pressuring Iran "could be undone if it was attacked prematurely."

Click here for full Jpost coverage of the Iranian threat

"A credible threat, the most credible threat, is an American threat," Hanegbi said. "The American threat is one that is abstract, and it doesn't necessarily translate to any promise for concrete action, and that might be why the Iranian's are disdaining and ignoring it."

Hanegbi continued: "In my opinion, the Israeli military threat is not an empty one."

Last month, Hanegbi warned there is no certainty that intelligence agencies will discover Iranian nuclear advancements in time in response to a comment by White House spokesman Jay Carney, who said the US would be able to intervene in time on the nuclear issue.

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu recently got into a diplomatic shouting match with US Ambassador Dan Shapiro over US President Barack Obama's handling of Iran's nuclear program, saying "time has run out" for diplomacy, Yediot Aharonot cited a source as saying on Friday.

Related Content

Bushehr nuclear Iranian
August 5, 2014
Iran and the bomb: The future of negotiations