Lieberman: Obama should define how to stop Iran

Senator tells 'Post' he wants "a little more detail" on what the US is willing to do to prevent Iran going nuclear.

September 11, 2012 03:05
2 minute read.
US Senator Joe Lieberman [file photo]

US Senator Joe Lieberman 370 (R). (photo credit: Joshua Roberts / Reuters)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

WASHINGTON -- Senator Joseph Lieberman encouraged US President Barack Obama on Monday to clearly define America’s red lines on Iran’s nuclear program.

“I hope he can find a way to really spell out with just a little more detail” what the US is willing to do to prevent Iran from become a nuclear power, Lieberman told The Jerusalem Post following an appearance at a B’nai B’rith conference.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

He said he wanted Obama to “take it beyond that just all options are on the table, including military force” when it comes to US intentions on the subject.

The issue of whether the US is willing to spell out red lines that, if Iran crossed, would trigger military action, has been a matter of contention between Israel and the Obama administration in recent weeks.

Lieberman told the Post that “the more the president can define what it means to support a policy of preventing Iran from getting nuclear weapons, the more he will raise the confidence level of the government of Israel that it doesn’t have to be forced to take action unilaterally.”

Click here for full Jpost coverage of the Iranian threat

He described a unilateral Israeli military strike as “not the best way” to deal with the Iranian threat. Instead, he said during the conference, if Iran leaves the world no choice between accepting an Iranian bomb or attacking Tehran’s nuclear facilities, the US should lead an international consortium in striking Iran.

“It ought to be led by the United States of America, which has the most significant military capabilities to carry this off and can do it in a way that will not have adverse political consequences for anybody, particularly Israel, in the Middle East,” he argued.

Lieberman said that America taking the lead in such united action next year, coming in the wake of Iranian intransigence, would be backed by US legislators. “There will be overwhelming bipartisan support for that action in the Congress of the United States,” he pledged.

Lieberman had just returned from a trip to the Middle East, where he visited many Arab countries and found “an unsettling prevalence of concern about whether America is still engaged forcefully in the Middle East.”

He said that those he spoke to expressed “a real desire that we show leadership because they still prefer us to any of the alternatives there, and particularly to the Islamic Republic of Iran.”

Related Content

Bushehr nuclear Iranian
August 5, 2014
Iran and the bomb: The future of negotiations