Romney says 'red line' on Iran is same as Obama's

Republican tells ABC, "red line is Iran may not have a nuclear weapon"; US official: Obama's red line is a nuclear weapon.

September 14, 2012 20:46
1 minute read.
Republican candidate Mitt Romney in Virginia

Republican candidate Mitt Romney in Virginia 370 (R). (photo credit: Jim Young / Reuters)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney admitted that his "red line" on an Iranian nuclear program are identical to the stated policies of his political opponent, incumbent US President Barack Obama.

In an interview with ABC, portions of which were published online Friday, interviewer George Stephanopoulos asks Romney if his "red line" is the same as Obama's.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

"Yes," the Republican candidate answered.

"My red line is Iran may not have a nuclear weapon," Romney explained. "Iran as a nuclear nation is unacceptable to the United States of America."

Romney did attempt to differentiating his proposed policies with Obama's, saying he thinks Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad should have been indicted for incitation to genocide and that "crippling sanctions" should have been put in place immediately.

He said he also would have stood with Iranian dissidents.

Click here for full Jpost coverage of the Iranian threat


Obama has long stated that a nuclear-armed Iran is unacceptable, but has recently refused to classify any point along the path to nuclear proliferation as a "red line," something demanded of Western powers by Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu.

Netanyahu and Obama held a late-night conversation last week after the prime minister said those countries who refuse to set red lines on Iran have no right to ask Israel not to attack the Islamic Republic's nuclear program.

Netanyahu this week told The Jerusalem Post that it was "a good conversation."

A senior White House official told The New York Times on Friday that during their phone call, Netanyahu asked the president to set a red line based on the size of Iran's highly enriched uranium stockpile. Crossing a red line would ostensibly trigger military action.

Obama, according to the official's account to the Times, was unwilling to commit to Netanyahu's red lines.

“We have a red line, which is a nuclear weapon," the unnamed official told the Times. We’re committed to that red line.”

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Bushehr nuclear Iranian
August 5, 2014
Iran and the bomb: The future of negotiations