'Sanctions may not be enough'

Israeli UN envoy, Gabriela Shalev expects weak resolution against Iran won't halt nukes.

April 1, 2010 09:32
4 minute read.
Gabriela Shalev

Gabriela Shalev 311. (photo credit: Shahar Azran)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


The softened sanctions against Iran that are likely to be passed in cooperation with China won't make Teheran halt its uranium enrichment program, according to Israel's Ambassador to the UN Gabriela Shalev.

"The sanctions being crafted won't prevent Iran from continuing to enrich uranium, though this does not preclude the possiblity some states will put in place more severe sanctions of their own," Shalev said Thursday morning on Army Radio.

The ambassador called China's joining the other permanent members of the security council for discussion of sanctions to be imposed on Iran important news, and welcome progress. But said it must be understood these sanctions would be limited by the wide partnership.

Will the US allow Israel to strike Iran's nuclear facilities?

The five permanent members of the UN Security Council and Germany are unified on putting together new sanctions on Iran over its suspect nuclear program, US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Thursday.

On Wednesday two US officials said that in a phone call among officials from the US, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany, the Chinese representative said his country, long a holdout against fresh international penalties against Iran, was prepared to discuss specific potential sanctions.

Clinton did not elaborate but responding to a question about the information released by the two anonymous US officials, she said they had "accurately described" the position of the group known as "P5-plus-one."

"There will be a great deal of further consultation, not only among the P5-plus-one but other members of the Security Council and other member nations during the next weeks," she told reporters.

The Obama administration is hoping to get a UN resolution by the end of April. Clinton has not publicly cited a specific timetable but in recent days has sounded more optimistic about the chances of getting China to agree that new penalties are needed to force Iran's hand.

Earlier a US intelligence report updated Iran had both made gains and suffered setbacks in a nuclear program that gives Teheran the possibility of building nuclear weapons, even though it has not moved decisively toward that goal.

“We continue to assess Iran is keeping open the option to develop nuclear weapons, though we do not know whether Teheran eventually will decide to produce nuclear weapons,” states the Central Intelligence Agency report, provided to Congress by the office of the director of national intelligence and posted recently on the DNI Web site.

“Iran continues to develop a range of capabilities that could be applied to producing nuclear weapons, if a decision is made to do so,” the report says.

Mathew Burrows, counselor to the US National Intelligence Council, told a Washington foreign press briefing that when it came to whether Teheran would move toward creating a nuclear bomb, the US intelligence agencies “continue to judge that Iran takes a cost-benefit approach in its nuclear decision-making. We judge that this offers the intelligence community – the international community – opportunities to influence Teheran’s decision-making.”

He did not specify what measures informed the decision-making process, but pointed to the US State Department as the agency working to influence that process.

In the meantime, he said, “we continue to assess that Iran has a scientific, technical and industrial capacity to produce enough highly enriched uranium for a weapon in the next few years if it chooses to do so, and eventually to produce nuclear weapons. The central issue is a decision to do so.”

The assessment provided to Congress, which covers international efforts to acquire WMD and advanced conventional capabilities over the course of 2009, contrasts with that of the National Intelligence Estimate of 2007, which judged that Iran had halted its nuclear weapons program.

The controversial 2007 NIE findings contradicted Israeli and other estimates. A revised estimate is expected to come out in the near future.

The new assessment found that “Iran continued to expand its nuclear infrastructure and continued uranium enrichment and activities related to its heavy water research reactor.”

But it added, “Although Iran made progress in expanding its nuclear infrastructure during 2009, some obstacles slowed progress during this period.” The nature of the obstacles was not specified.

The report also noted Iranian progress in its ballistic missile program and its capability of producing chemical and potentially biological warfare agents.

The recent findings also addressed the continued nuclear ties between Iran, North Korea and Syria. It singled out Syria for having “engaged for more than a decade in a covert nuclear program with North Korean assistance.”

Noting that the reactor being built by that covert program had been destroyed in September 2007 – widely reported as having been done by Israel – and that Syria had gone to “great lengths to try to eradicate evidence of its existence,” the report labels Damascus “generally uncooperative” with international investigators.

“The covert nature of the program, the characteristics of the reactor, and Syria’s extreme efforts to deny and destroy evidence of the reactor after its destruction are inconsistent with peaceful nuclear applications,” the report states, adding that the country already had a stockpile of chemical warfare agents on hand.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Bushehr nuclear Iranian
August 5, 2014
Iran and the bomb: The future of negotiations