'Strike on Iran nukes no longer viable'

Top French general says military intervention too risky: "If you fail in one shot, it's a catastrophe."

September 10, 2009 19:48
1 minute read.
'Strike on Iran nukes no longer viable'

sarkozy georgelin 248 88. (photo credit: Archive)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The head of the French military said Thursday that military intervention is no longer a viable option to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear capability. French chief-of-staff Gen. Jean-Louis Georgelin said following a speech that that he believes a military operation would be too risky. "It is very difficult to plan a military operation in Iran, because we are not sure in one shot to be able to solve a problem and if you fail in one shot, it is a catastrophe," he said in English. "I don't think at this stage a military option is still available." Georgelin was answering a question after a speech at the Atlantic Council in Washington on France's new relationship with NATO and stressed that the comment was his opinion. Georgelin was in the United States to attend a ceremony Wednesday as French Gen. Stephane Abrial became the first non-American officer to permanently fill a NATO command post. The new position followed France's decision this year to return to NATO's military command, a decision-making body within the U.S.-dominated alliance. The frank military assessment on Iran appeared to go beyond recent public comments by French officials. French President Nicolas Sarkozy has taken a tougher line on Iran than his predecessor, and hitched himself closer to the American position. Sarkozy startled diplomatic circles when in 2007 he mentioned the possibility of military intervention. He said wanted to avoid "a catastrophic alternative: an Iranian bomb, or the bombing of Iran" if diplomacy fails. Soon afterward, Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said the world should "prepare for the worst" in Iran, specifically "war." Since US President Barack Obama took office in January, both Sarkozy and Kouchner have generally shied away from publicly discussing the prospect of war in Iran. Georgelin said that he believes economic and political pressure will be more effective than military action in Iran. "At this stage, my personal opinion is that for Iran I fear that the military option is probably beyond us and that the action should be as our president said several times in acting on financial pressure, economic pressure, political pressure," he said. Georgelin also noted the importance of close coordination with Israel "in order not to let it strike alone with all the risks it could entail."

Related Content

Bushehr nuclear Iranian
August 5, 2014
Iran and the bomb: The future of negotiations