Analysis: Netanyahu strikes back

Three former Netanyahu associates have now turned state's witness in cases that involve the prime minister.

By
March 7, 2018 21:47
2 minute read.
Netanyahu

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends the weekly cabinet meeting at the Prime Minister's office in Jerusalem January 7, 2018. . (photo credit: ABIR SULTAN / REUTERS)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The battle lines are finally drawn.

Late Wednesday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu finally struck back with force against his line of close aides who have turned state’s witness against him in the various public corruption cases.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


As late as Tuesday, Netanyahu’s legal team still could not convey to The Jerusalem Post a coherent counterpoint to this tidal wave.

It had issued a short statement that the volume of state’s witnesses proved that they were all worthless.

If one of them was truly a silver bullet, then the police would have had no reason to give lenient plea bargains to the others.

There was some truth to this. The police’s granting top Netanyahu communications aide Nir Hefetz a deal with no jail time whatsoever was astonishing and possibly devalued the evidentiary power of whatever former aides Ari Harow and Shlomo Filber could bring against the prime minister.

But this all sidestepped the real question he may have to answer in court: Are they all lying against him, and if so, why? There are a very limited number of responses a defendant can make to such close state witnesses.



The argument that they are know-nothings does not hold water.

So one option is the scorched-earth strategy.

A defendant says that they are evil lying sinners who committed whatever crimes they have admitted to in order to enrich themselves, and their accusations against the defendant are just part of that pattern of falsity.

This is the strategy when the former aides were on the take and are considered lost causes.

The second is the pity strategy.

A defendant says, they may have been honest and maybe they were not getting any illegal bribes, but those poor former aides – the police scared them so much about jail time that they cracked and thought they had no choice but to turn on me to escape with their freedom.

This is the tactic that Netanyahu finally chose Wednesday night. Each of the aides were known for loyalty to the prime minister, and at least Filber and Harow are not accused of enriching themselves personally.

He also may still hope that suddenly in court, if he treats them right, they may have difficulty accusing him – a phenomenon that has happened before.

This will be a hard defense against aides who are now saying that they lied and withheld for months for the sole reason of protecting Netanyahu.

But it is probably his best bet. Whether it will be enough, only time will tell.

Related Content

August 20, 2018
Israeli talk show suspended for labeling MKs 'terrorists'

By AMY SPIRO