Animal welfare enforcement to remain in Agriculture Ministry

While the Agriculture Ministry has long maintained that it should enforce Animal Welfare Law, activists have argued that the Environmental Protection Ministry would be preferable.

By
December 14, 2015 03:59
1 minute read.
Cows. Illustrative

Cows. Illustrative. (photo credit: REUTERS)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The Agriculture Ministry’s will retain responsibility for enforcing the Animal Welfare Law, the cabinet decided on Sunday, to the dismay of many animal rights activists.

At the same time, the government intends to strengthen enforcement measures under the law.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


The cabinet accepted the recommendations of an inter-ministerial team that had examined the subject.

While the Agriculture Ministry has long maintained that it should enforce Animal Welfare Law, activists have argued that the Environmental Protection Ministry would be preferable, due to conflicts of interests faced by the Agriculture Ministry in protecting the interests of both animals and agricultural producers.

“The government’s decision to adopt the committee’s recommendations will give us better tools to protect animals and safeguard their welfare, and so it will be done,” Agriculture Minister Uri Ariel said.

“The decision to leave the powers over protecting animal welfare in the Agriculture Ministry is correct and is a tribute that honors the ministry’s employees.”

Among the recommendations adopted by the cabinet are a series of measures to reinforce animal welfare, including the expansion of legal regulation in the sector and increased supervision, enforcement and punishment for violations, a spokesman for Ariel said.



In accordance with the committee’s suggestions, the unit that handles animal welfare will be expanded, receiving a budget of NIS 6.6 million annually, in addition to the NIS 4.5m. already designated toward preventing the proliferation of stray animals.

While animal rights activists praised the decision to increase the animal welfare budget and expand enforcement measures, they expressed disappointment that the authority for enforcing the law would remain in the hands of the Agriculture Ministry.

Profound changes – such as improving conditions at municipal shelters, ending the killing of dogs, increasing stray cat sterilizations and improving abuse investigations – are critical for protecting Israel’s animals, Anonymous for Animal Rights and Let Animals Live said in a joint statement.

“We will follow the implementation of the government decision...and will examine whether the Agriculture Ministry was able to substantially reduce abuse, or if the built-in conflict of interest in its operations prevented it from performing the job,” they said.

Related Content

July 20, 2018
The Scorpions sweep Tel Aviv with a 'Wind of Change'

By JULIANE HELMHOLD