Cutting the red tape on imports: An important step toward lowering Israel's cost of living

Getting rid of some messy import policies would help spur competition and bring down prices.

By
November 14, 2014 00:25
3 minute read.
Port of Ashdod

Port of Ashdod. (photo credit: REUTERS)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Cutting down on burdensome import regulation is more important than lowering import duties, according to the findings of a report issued by the Finance and Economy ministries published on Thursday.

The Committee for Increasing Competition and Reducing Import Barriers, which was appointed in August 2013 by Finance Minister Yair Lapid and Economy Minister Naftali Bennett to examine why the cost of living was higher in Israel than other OECD countries, found in its final report that lowering import taxes had little effect on the final price of many goods. The greatest beneficiaries of cutting duties, the report said, were importers.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


Instead, the web of red tape makes it costly and time-consuming for importers – especially small and medium ones – to bring new products to market. Getting rid of some of those policies would help spur competition, and bring down prices.

Although some 70 percent of goods people consume in Israel are imported, “the Israeli market is characterized by a high regulatory burden and a particularly heavy load of bureaucracy in comparison to significant import markets around the world,” according to the report.

For example, Israel requires importers to get a slew of certifications before they start importing, even for products that have been approved in the past or carry little risk of harm to consumers. Non-perishable food products, for instance, require approval before they can be imported, while the Health Ministry must give its stamp of approval for cosmetics.

While complying with safety standards is important, Israel’s standards are often more stringent or simply different from those in, say, Europe. That means an exporter who sells a European product has to get a separate set of approvals before he can sell to Israel. Soy milk and other milk substitutes, for example, are not allowed in because there is a regulation against calling such products “milk.” Restrictions on cribs and children’s beds are out of sync with those commonly accepted in the West.

When goods arrive at the ports, the number of test and checks carried out cause delays procedures and increases costs, giving an advantage to big importers who can stomach the extra financial burden.



Meanwhile, a study of World Bank data on the effects of lowering duties found disappointing results in final prices.

“Removing bureaucratic barriers will help reduce the cost of imports, will open the market and will be reflected in a reduction in private expenditures for the Israeli consumer,” Lapid said, throwing his weight behind the committee’s eight main recommendations.

Lowering the cost of living was the government’s central struggle, he added.

To ease the bureaucracy, the committee recommended more self-regulation for importers, shifting the onus from the state to them to ensure their products were up to standards. That would mean fewer checks, but also require tougher enforcement.

The local standards institute should also match Israel’s standards to those accepted by other countries, add more members to the board responsible for standards, and make them more accessible to the public. Setting up a website listing import information would increase transparency, promote parallel imports and prevent anti-competitive practices, helping more importers enter the market.

Labeling imports should not be required before they arrive in Israel, the committee suggested.

The government has already accepted one recommendation covering personal imports – the price of products that people can import for personal use without paying duties rose from $325 to $500.

Finally, the committee recommended putting all the policy controls under one roof: the Economy Ministry.

“The Lang Committee is breaking the monopoly of interests that has controlled Israel’s imports for many years, and is changing the equation by which the importer is guilty until proven innocent,” Bennett said, referring to the committee by the name of Economy Ministry director-general Amit Lang, who spearheaded it.

Related Content

The International Criminal Court in The Hague
August 18, 2018
What does IDF closing Black Friday war crimes probe mean for ICC?

By YONAH JEREMY BOB