Defense minister discusses readiness for tunnels with MKs during closed session

State comptroller’s probe of cabinet’s wartime conduct, legality of IDF actions during Protective Edge, continues.

By
September 18, 2014 03:57
2 minute read.
Moshe Yaalon

Moshe Yaalon. (photo credit: MARC ISRAEL SELLEM/THE JERUSALEM POST)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon on Wednesday responded to criticism regarding the IDF’s readiness to confront the Hamas tunnel threat during the recent Gaza war.

His testimony to the Knesset State Control Committee was closed to the media, but committee chairman Amnon Cohen (Shas) issued a press release confirming that he would continue to call other Defense Ministry officials to testify and that the State Comptroller’s office would also be reviewing the IDF’s readiness on the issue.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


Almost immediately following Cohen’s statement, State Comptroller Joseph Shapira issued a statement confirming that he was checking both the tunnels issue, possible cabinet leaks and whether IDF actions during the war conformed with international law.

Shapira reminded the public that he had announced the start of such an investigation as early as mid-August, while the war was still under way.

Several surprise attacks emanated from the tunnels, attacks in which soldiers were killed.

Heavy criticism was directed against the political and security establishments claiming the IDF was unprepared for the scope of the Hamas tunnel threat, with each establishment leaking off-the-record attacks on the other to shift responsibility.

A primary defense by politicians and some military officials has been to blame the intelligence sector for not being fully in the know, but a 2007 state comptroller’s report on the issue that said the entire defense establishment had been part of an “ongoing failure.”



Among those mentioned as being involved in the anti-tunnel effort at the time were then-IDF chief and current Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon, then-deputy IDF chief Maj.-Gen. Dan Halutz, then-OC Ground Forces Maj.- Gen. Yiftah Ron-Tal and then-OC Combat Engineering Corps Brig.-Gen.

Shimon Daniel.

The report came after several incidents in which soldiers were killed or kidnapped, most notably tank gunner Gilad Schalit, by Hamas men attacking from tunnels, in ambushes similar to the recent ones.

The 2007 report recommended numerous urgent changes, “in light of the flawed handling of the threat in the three areas reviewed, the conceptual foundation for addressing the issue, technological efforts and intelligence handling of the threat, each of them individually and collectively.”

The first recommendation was to appoint a point-person in the IDF who would have full coordinating power to make sure that all efforts were undertaken in a unified fashion.

This was in contrast to the previous appointment of certain officials to handle the issue in theory, where the comptroller found that they were never given sufficient authority or included in all government meetings on the issue, such that their ideas were ignored.

The second recommendation was that better mechanisms for alerting soldiers and civilians in real-time about threats emanating from tunnels, as well as for providing intelligence to forward troops to react promptly, needed to be developed.

This recommendation mentioned the necessity of oversight and intervention by the political leadership.

Third, the resources of the IDF, the Defense Ministry and private-sector experts needed to be better pooled and mobilized to address faster location and neutralizing of the tunnels.

At the time, the IDF gave a number of responses to the report’s conclusions, including that the threat of tunnels would take time to address because it was unprecedented.

Related Content

The International Criminal Court in The Hague
August 18, 2018
What does IDF closing Black Friday war crimes probe mean for ICC?

By YONAH JEREMY BOB