High Court rules on racial profiling at Ben-Gurion Airport

Court dismisses a civil rights petition, but leaves the door open for future cases.

March 11, 2015 13:54
1 minute read.
Ben Gurion Airport

Ben Gurion Airport. (photo credit: REUTERS)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The High Court of Justice on Wednesday carved out a middle ground in one of the most important recent cases to be decided on the issue of racial profiling, with the particular case relating to security at Ben-Gurion Airport.

The court dismissed the petition calling for the complete elimination of racial profiling and partially accepted the state’s argument that it could not completely change without heavily burdening all travelers.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

But it reimbursed the petitioner – the Association for Civil Rights in Israel – NIS 30,000 for its legal fees and recognized that the petition had already gotten security to be less discriminatory.

The dismissal was only procedural, leaving the door open to ACRI to file a new petition in the future if necessary.

ACRI itself issued a mixed reaction, taking credit for some degree of an improvement in the situation and some reduction in racial profiling. But ACRI lawyer Aooni Bana said that because it did not rule on the broader issue of whether racial profiling is illegal in principle, “the High Court wasted an opportunity to stop formal ethnic discrimination in the Israeli airports. Arab citizens are stigmatized as suspects and undergo a separate and demeaning process only because of their ethnic identity.

Related Content

 Hundreds of members of LGBT community protest surrogacy law in Tel Aviv
July 22, 2018
LGBT campaign snowballs as hundreds of companies support nationwide strike