High Court tells Shin Bet to tone down questioning political activists

The Shin Bet committed in June to telling political activists they do not need to come when summoned for questioning.

By
February 7, 2017 21:30
1 minute read.
Sussiya

Right-wing activists and Palestinians clash at Sussiya.. (photo credit: Courtesy)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The High Court of Justice on Tuesday instructed the Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) and the attorney- general to have clearer procedures and limits and promote oversight for questioning political activists.

During the court’s decision, it also dismissed a request to entirely prohibit such questioning.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


Under the pressure of a petition from an NGO, the state had already told the High Court in June 2016 that the Shin Bet would be less aggressive in questioning political activists.

The NGO, the Association for Civil Rights in Israel, filed the petition in 2013 to fight what it viewed as attempts to oppress free speech and political action. It has viewed the case’s results as a mixed bag of success and defeat.

On one hand, in June 2016, the Shin Bet had committed to telling political activists who it considers subversive and potential troublemakers, but not terrorists, that when it summons them for informal meetings, they do not need to come and that their statements cannot be used in court and other procedures.

This will be true whether the activists are summoned verbally or in writing.

On the other hand, an ACRI spokesman indicated that the Shin Bet refused to show them the text they would use for summoning activists.



Also, as a bigger picture threshold issue, ACRI had hoped the court would declare such summons illegal if they were not to cope with a clear security or terror threat.

An ACRI spokesman said that it appeared that the court was accepting the idea that the Shin Bet had the authority to issue summons to political activists who it considered troublesome or destabilizing even absent a clear security threat.

In the petition, ACRI cited a 2012 summoning of an activist who was against government plans to resettle the Beduin in the Negev from unauthorized villages to larger cities as an example of a coercive measure that chilled the freedom to organize around political causes.

Though the court dismissed the petition’s request of prohibiting informal questioning, it granted the NGO NIS 15,000 in court costs saying it had done a public service by moving the state toward clearer procedures, limits and oversight regarding the questioning.

Related Content

August 17, 2018
Netanyahu interrogated for four hours in Case 4000 media bribery probe

By TAMARA ZIEVE