NGO: State must protect rights of migrant mothers, children

Currently, many of the complaints regarding mistreatment of migrants in detention are serious, but the volume of those facing these issues are smaller than in the recent past.

April 14, 2019 17:25
3 minute read.
NGO: State must protect rights of migrant mothers, children

A boy takes part in a protest against the Israeli government's plan to deport African migrants, in Tel Aviv, Israel March 24, 2018.. (photo credit: REUTERS/CORINNA KERN)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


The state must do more to protect the rights of African migrant mothers and children when they are detained, the Hotline for Refugees and Migrants said in its annual 2018 report.

In fact, the NGO said that it believes any detention of migrant mothers and children is legally and ethically problematic if it is not based on committing a crime that signals that the persons are dangerous and merely based on the migrants crossing into Israel without permission.

However, given that the Hotline said it recognized that this situation was not likely to change in the near future, it demanded that the state at the very least show greater attention to protecting the rights of such vulnerable persons while detained.

More specifically, the report noted instances of varying levels of violence by Israel Prisons Service personnel who it said treated migrants in temporary detention as hard-core criminals instead of refugees fleeing persecution.

The report recommended that the state develop more formal guidelines to safeguard especially the rights of mothers and children in temporary detention.

Further, the NGO said that the state must have an independent investigative entity reviewing complaints against the IPS for physical violence as well as violations of migrants’ attorney-client privilege rights.

Another example where the Hotline said that the state violated migrants’ rights in a more glaring manner was its handling of a new group of refugees from Sri Lanka who arrived in Israel in October.

The Hotline said that these migrants were not even allowed to request recognition of their refugee status and were kept completely cut off from the outer world in the Yahalom and Givon detention centers.

Eventually, the Sri Lankan migrants were sent out of the country in a way which the report said violated their rights.

As of December 2018, there were approximately 33,627 African migrants down from a high of around 60,000 some years earlier. At the core of the migrants issue is the never-ending debate as to whether they came to Israel to flee persecution, which would entitle them to refugee status, or merely to earn better wages, which would not.

The migrants’ saga in Israel can be divided into multiple stages.

At one stage the state succeeded in deporting around 25,000 migrants, mostly from Eritrea and Sudan, out of Israel, and often even to third countries such as Rwanda and Uganda.

The state accomplished this with a set of policies that included extended periods of detention, prohibitions on working and other policies which the Hotline described as harassment.

It combined these policies with offers to pay the migrants up to a few thousand dollars if they agreed to be deported.

At the next stage, a combination of victories by the migrants at the High Court along with Rwanda and Uganda suspending in spring 2018 their willingness to take migrants from Israel led to the closing of the Holot detention center and a heavy reduction in the volume of detained migrants.

Currently, many of the complaints regarding mistreatment of migrants in detention are serious, but the volume of those facing these issues are smaller than in the recent past.

There is an ongoing legal battle about whether the state will start accepting more Eritreans as refugees or deporting more of them due to a ruling by a lower court in August 2018 against Eritreans, but with some counter-trends within the legal establishment and from previous High Court rulings.

Until that legal debate is resolved, the state has mostly frozen its evaluation of migrants’ applications for refugee status, which in any case, the state had always processed as a snail’s pace.

Hotline CEO Dr. Ayelet Oz said that the report, “sheds light on the reality that the Population, Immigration and Borders Authority does everything it can to keep itself [its treatment of African migrants] far from the public eye…I hope this report will not fall on deaf ears.”

She called on Israel to better fulfill its obligations to refugees under international conventions.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

June 20, 2019
Eighteen fruitful years


Cookie Settings