Petition claims welfare-budget funding exacerbates inequality

The High Court of Justice is reviewing a petition that seeks to strike down this method of financing, on the grounds that it is not equitable.

By
December 20, 2017 04:35
2 minute read.
Petition claims welfare-budget funding exacerbates inequality

A woman begs in Jerusalem. (photo credit: MARC ISRAEL SELLEM/THE JERUSALEM POST)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Poor municipalities receive less funding for welfare services than richer localities due to the state’s budget matching system.

As part of the system, social service departments in local authorities provide services financed through matched funding. For every shekel spent by the local authority, the Labor and Social Services Ministry provides an additional NIS 3, so that 75% of the local welfare budget is financed by the national government and 25% by the local authority.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


The High Court of Justice is reviewing a petition that seeks to strike down this method of financing, on the grounds that it is not equitable.

A discussion in the Knesset State Control Committee on Monday addressed the inequality and the “unanimous understanding” among MKs, academics, and municipal authorities of the need to implement a new budgeting method.

MK Shelly Yacimovich, chairwoman of the committee, said, “Everyone agrees that matching is a distorted mechanism with a clear result: The powerful and rich authorities become stronger and richer, while the weaker and poorer authorities become weaker and poorer.”

The Taub Center for Social Policy Studies in Israel published a report earlier this month which revealed that the richest municipal authorities spend an average of NIS 9,095 per client annually, while for Israeli-Arab authorities, which are among the poorest, the figure is NIS 3,387.

This discrepancy, the study found, was that the matching funds from the ministry create a gap that increases the disadvantage of poorer localities; among them the average per-client expenditure is NIS 3,170 a year, compared to NIS 5,400 for the remaining authorities.



Mayors of poor municipalities are often forced to forfeit welfare services due to the matching system, while stronger municipalities receive increased funding to provide their residents with better welfare services.

Na’im Shibli, mayor of Shibli- Umm al-Ghanam, an Arab town at the foot of Mount Tabor in the Lower Galilee, said that the locality was forced to seek donations to pay its 25% to run a day center for seniors.

Mayors from richer municipalities, however, say that they are forced to pay much more than 25% of the funds to provide their citizens with welfare services, and that they too need additional funding from the state.

Labor and Social Services Minister Haim Katz announced at the Knesset discussion that he was considering a gradual reduction in poorer authorities’ participation rate in welfare budgets, within the framework of the 2019 state budget.

Despite this, Katz explained that abolishing the matching system entirely would cost NIS 2 billion – money that would be deducted from important welfare services.

“I have to decide – [between getting rid of local] matching [funds], and [providing services for things such as] autism,” he said.

“The population increases by 2.9% every year, life expectancy goes up, so we need to allocate more to the elderly.

I don’t know where to find money for everything,” he said.

Related Content

Youth hold their prayer shawls as they stand in front of the Western Wall, May 17, 2017.
July 23, 2018
WATCH: Stone falls out of Western Wall above egalitarian prayer platform

By TAMAR BEN-OZER