Knesset cancels 'no opinions' clause in Public Broadcast Law

32 MKs voted to cancel the clause and none opposed.

By
November 30, 2015 17:42
1 minute read.
Israeli Knesset

Israeli Knesset members arguing in parliament.. (photo credit: KNESSET CHANNEL)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

The Knesset voted to cancel a controversial amendment banning the expression of personal opinions in public broadcasts, in a final vote on Monday.

MK Nachman Shai (Zionist Union) said, “There needs to be ethics in public broadcast and in all broadcasts, but it is not the Knesset’s business.”

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


Shai, who proposed the bill to cancel the provision together with MK Yossi Yonah (Zionist Union), advised the heads of the new Israel Broadcast Corporation to draft their own ethical code.

Science and Technology Minister Ophir Akunis, who was responsible for reforming the Israel Broadcast Authority, denied that the clause was meant to censor anyone.

“There was a great public upheaval about nothing, which was based on imprecision, in the best case, and despicableness in the worst case,” he argued. “Everyone used political, false spin, including people in the government.”

Akunis said the clause was meant to ensure that personal opinions would not be part of news broadcasts.

“I did not want to censor... I wanted the views of entire sections of the public who feel excluded – because their stances are not expressed – to be expressed,” he explained.

JPOST VIDEOS THAT MIGHT INTEREST YOU:


In a second and third reading, 32 MKs voted to cancel the clause and none opposed.

The canceled provision was added by MK Yisrael Eichler (United Torah Judaism) during the second reading of the bill to dismantle the Israel Broadcast Authority and replace it with a new public corporation.

It stated that broadcasts should “avoid one-sidedness, prejudice, expressions of personal opinion, giving grades and affixing labels, ignoring facts or selectively emphasizing them not according to their newsworthiness.”

Eichler said he based the text on the “Nakdi Document,” a part of the IBA ethical code since 1972.

The amendment passed in September.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

September 25, 2018
Opening the TLV-Jerusalem rail: From anticipation to political opportunism

By JPOST EDITORIAL