Sara Netanyahu petitions to reverse court’s Naftali ruling

In February and again in May of 2016, the lower Jerusalem Region Labor Court ruled in favor of Naftali and Eliyahu, respectively, against the state and against Sara Netanyahu’s narrative.

By
March 27, 2017 22:51
1 minute read.
Sara Netanyahu

Sara Netanyahu. (photo credit: MARC ISRAEL SELLEM)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Sara Netanyahu on Monday petitioned the High Court of Justice to reverse the NIS 267,500 National Labor Court judgment in favor of two former employees of the Prime Minister’s Residence against her and the Prime Minister’s Office.

On March 9, the National Labor Court declined to let Netanyahu appeal, confirming a lower court’s ruling that only the state had that right, since the civil-damages claim in the case was technically against it.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


The first judgment awarded was NIS 170,000 to former house manager Meni Naftali as compensation for unpaid overtime hours and poor treatment received on the job. The second awarded NIS 97,500 to Guy Eliyahu for having been abused while an employee in the Prime Minister’s Residence.

In February and again in May of 2016, the lower Jerusalem Region Labor Court ruled in favor of Naftali and Eliyahu, respectively, against the state and against Sara Netanyahu’s narrative.

Naftali was house manager from February 2011 to November 2012.

Netanyahu argued that Naftali’s case and the lower court ruling contained such significant findings against her character, she should have a right to get them overturned.

In contrast, the National Labor Court ruled that even though she was central to the narrative of the case, it was only in the role of a fact-witness and not as a defendant.



Technically, the three defendants were the Prime Minister’s Office; office official Ezra Seidoff; and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu himself, though ultimately the prime minister played no role in the trial.

In the original trial, Sara testified that “the baseless lies, slander and mudslinging which Mani Naftali told about the wife of the prime minister in court – who is not even a defendant in his case – are scandalous. Nothing less than that.”

In the end, though, the three-person panel – Judge Dita Pruginin, employee representative Natan Mizrahi and employer representative Eliezer Yaari – believed Naftali over Sara Netanyahu almost across the board.

In their decision they wrote of Sara’s attacks on Naftali: “There was no evidentiary basis in what was presented before us, and there was not even a lot of proof to support them.”

Related Content

Rami Feinstein
August 18, 2018
Music from the heart

By ARIEL DOMINIQUE HENDELMAN