Shurat Hadin battles to seize Internet assets of Iran, Syria, N.Korea to pay terror victims

The move to seize the Internet assets is unprecedented and could have great consequences beyond the already noteworthy cases.

September 29, 2014 02:42
2 minute read.
Khamenei on a computer screen

Khamenei on a computer screen. (photo credit: INGIMAGE,REUTERS)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For a symbolic $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


The battle for Shurat Hadin – Israel Law Center and the American families of victims it represents who hold unsatisfied US federal court judgments against Iran, Syria and North Korea for sponsoring terrorism amounting to more than a billion dollars kicked into high gear recently, with the NGO filing a motion to push forward with trying to seize Internet assets used by those countries.

The Jerusalem Post acquired copies of the unreported court documents filed at the end of last week. Also last week, the nuclear negotiations with Iran that connect to frozen assets came back to the headlines.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

The move to seize the Internet assets is unprecedented and could have great consequences beyond the already noteworthy cases.

The assets that the NGO and US firm Raines Feldman LLP seek to seize include all the “top-level domain” names provided by those countries, including the .ir TLD, the Farsi-letter version of the .ir TLD and all Internet Protocol addresses being utilized by the Iranian government and its agencies as well as those being used by Syria and North Korea.

Subpoenas to produce documents related to the Internet assets were served on the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), an agency of the US Department of Commerce, which is the administrator of the World Wide Web, in June.

At the time, the NGO said that “domain names (such as are the unique words or phrases that users depend upon to find places and information on the Internet.

Domain names are structured hierarchically; the top of being the “top-level” domain (TLD), the suffix attached to the domain name, such as “.com”, and “country-code” TLD’s (ccTLD’s) such as “.ir,” for Iran.”

It added that “countries are authorized by ICANN to allocate those TLD’s, making “.ir,” belonging to judgment debtor Iran, a practical asset.”

Shurat Hadin Director Nitzana Darshan-Leitner said: “This is the first time that terror victims have moved to seize the domain names, IPs and Internet licenses of terrorism-sponsoring states like Iran and are attempting to satisfy their court judgments.”

But the attempted Iran seizure, which was also tried with Syria and North Korea, was just the opening salvo.

On July 29, ICAAN filed a motion to quash the subpoenas, arguing that: 1) Internet country codes are not property that can be seized, 2) these codes are not owned by the countries to which they are assigned, 3) the codes are not located within Washington, DC, where the case is occurring, 4) that US law blocks the courts from involvement in such property since it is not used for commercial activity in the US, 5) ICAAN does not have unilateral power to delegate the codes to the NGO, and 6) forced delegation of the codes would destroy their value and jeopardize the operation of the Internet.

Shurat Hadin responded by asking the court to extend its time for discovering evidence from ICAAN to prove that the Internet assets can be seized, and cited several items of evidence already uncovered.

For example, it said that the country of Columbia sold its code for $109 million in 2014 to a US company called Neustar, showing that the country code is property that can be seized and has value that countries can even market for profit.

In a similar example, it said that the government of Tuvalu recently sold its country code to Verisign for more than $100m.

The NGO noted that ICAAN has authority to delegate country codes.

Related Content

An El Al plane in Ben Gurion Airport
June 24, 2018
El Al accommodates ultra-Orthodox men who won’t sit next to women