US court dismisses new tactic to sue Facebook for terrorism

Facebook had dismissed prior cases arguing the US Communications Decency Act (1996) bars all legal claims against it for posts by third parties using its platform.

By
May 18, 2017 21:42
1 minute read.
Facebook

Facebook. (photo credit: ILLUSTRATIVE: REUTERS)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

A US federal court in Brooklyn on Thursday dismissed both the Richard Lakin and Taylor Force civil cases against Facebook in a blow to efforts to use a new tactic of suing the social media giant for terrorism to get it to rein in Palestinian terrorists’ use of its platform.

Lakin, killed by two Palestinians armed with a knife and a gun on a Jerusalem bus in October 2015, was one of the original plaintiffs in a 2015 lawsuit filed by a group of 20,000 Israelis against Facebook.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


The lawsuit was filed against Facebook for allegedly providing a platform for terrorists involved in the “stabbing intifada,” and demanding an injunction ordering the firm to act more forcefully against terrorist incitement.

The 20,000 plaintiffs’ case was combined with a $1 billion damages case on behalf of the families of five victims, including US Army veteran Taylor Force, killed in a terrorist attack in March 2016 in Jaffa, against the terrorist group Hamas.

Shurat Hadin – Israel Law Center, representing the plaintiffs, was hopeful it had found the first-ever legal silver bullet for breaking what has been an impenetrable barrier protecting Facebook from terrorism lawsuits.

Facebook had dismissed prior cases arguing the US Communications Decency Act (1996) bars all legal claims against it for posts by third parties using its platform.

Shurat Hadin Director Nitsana Darshan-Leitner responded stating that she was disappointed, but looked forward to a strong appeal. She said, “The district court simply ignored the claim that Facebook is liable for providing material support to designated terrorist groups when it allows Hamas, Hezbollah, ISIS and the PLO to utilize its social media pages.”



“There is no difference between providing banking services to terrorists and providing a Facebook or Twitter account,” she added.

Related Content

Israelis run for shelter as a siren sounds during a rocket attack at the southern city of Sderot Jul
August 20, 2018
Lull in violence provides little relief for Gaza border residents

By TAMARA ZIEVE