Barkan remains on Gush Shalom boycott list

Despite leaving W. Bank,

By JACOB KANTER
December 3, 2009 20:27
2 minute read.
barkan wine 88

barkan wine 88. (photo credit: )

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Though Barkan winery recently vacated its factory in the Barkan industrial zone in the West Bank, Israeli peace organization Gush Shalom has decided to keep Israel's second largest winery on its list of companies whose products are made in the settlements, along with a call to boycott the winery. Sa'ar Faraj, Barkan's legal adviser, wrote to Gush Shalom this week asking for the winery to be removed from the list, where it has appeared since the list's creation in 1995. "I'd like to make it clear that Barkan does not produce materials in settlements whatsoever, nor does it purchase raw materials made in settlements," Faraj wrote. "Please make sure to remove Barkan from the list immediately." In 2004, Barkan began moving their operations from Barkan to Hulda, a kibbutz within the pre-1967 borders. Israeli-based beverage company Tempo, which owns Barkan winery, is partly owned by Dutch-based Heineken International. According to Gush Shalom, the Dutch government's opposition to Israeli settlements in the West Bank led Heineken to pressure Tempo to have Barkan move out of the West Bank. The move has since been completed, but the company still operates three wineries within the Golan Heights, which Gush Shalom considers illegally occupied territory. "The Golan Heights counts, for us, as a settlement," said Gush Shalom spokesman Adam Keller, who responded to Faraj's letter informing him that Barkan would remain on the list. "If Barkan were to get rid of [its] Golan Heights wineries, we would take them off the list, and let all of the organizations we work with [know] that we don't want to boycott them anymore." Faraj, though, is not convinced of the legality of Gush Shalom's definition of settlement, which is "any community of Israeli civilians living on land captured by the IDF in the war between June 5 to June 10 1967." "Their definition is not accurate by law," Faraj said. "The Golan Heights is part of Israel as far as I know." Gush Shalom considered removing Barkan from the list after learning of its move to Hulda in August 2008, but decided against it. "There are several other companies on the list that have operations in the Golan Heights," Keller said. Faraj said that Barkan, which has maintained its economic standing despite its placement on Gush Shalom's list for 14 years, has no immediate plans to shut down its Golan Heights wineries. "We're still considering the next step to take," he said. "But I find it hard to believe that we would [move out of the Golan Heights]."

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town

By SHARON UDASIN